Article 50 ruling due day before MPs vote on May’s Brexit deal
People's Vote campaigners on the march. Photograph: Ollie Millington / RMV / PA, - Credit: Zuma Press/PA Images
The European Court of Justice will deliver its ruling on whether the UK can unilaterally revoke its withdrawal from the EU the day the crunch vote on the prime minister's Brexit deal.
The ruling will come less than a week after a European Court of Justice (ECJ) Advocate General issued a legal opinion stating that the UK can unilaterally revoke its withdrawal from the EU.
MORE: Subscribe to The New European for 26 weeks at just £30 - save £75!
MORE: Watch David Lammy's barnstorming speech to the Commons on Brexit
Manuel Campos Sanchez-Bordona rejected the contention that Article 50 only allows the possibility of revocation following a unanimous decision of the European Council.
The opinion is not binding on the court but campaigners who brought the case said it is considered very influential, and welcomed the news the ruling would be delivered before December 11.
SNP MP Joanna Cherry, one of those involved in bringing the case, tweeted: 'CJEU will give final judgment in Article 50 case at 8am on Monday morning so our aim of ensuring MPs know revocation is possible before the #MeaningfulVote will be achieved.
You may also want to watch:
'Thank to all who have supported us'.
Campaigners have said if the ECJ rules that the UK can unilaterally revoke Brexit it could give the country the option to 'stop the clock' on leaving the EU as it would give an alternative to the options of the prime minister's deal or no-deal.
MORE: Delia Smith: 'Everything about Brexit screams wrong'
MORE: Record majority now think Brexit was the wrong decision
Most Read
- 1 Telling the truth is now the only sackable offence
- 2 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 3 How long can Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi play on?
- 4 Cost of Brexit is already 38 times more than the money set aside for levelling up
- 5 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
- 6 What I learned by avoiding England and the Euros
- 7 Could southern discomfort sink a rebalancing agenda still in its infancy?
- 8 Why Bristol is the street art city
- 9 Priti Patel - the poster girl for our poisonous politics
- 10 Could Boris Johnson still use the NHS as leverage in a US trade deal?
The case was brought forward by a group of Scottish politicians - Labour MEPs Catherine Stihler and David Martin, Joanna Cherry MP and Alyn Smith MEP of the SNP, as well as Green MSPs Andy Wightman and Ross Greer, together with lawyer Jolyon Maugham QC, director of the Good Law Project.
Their request for the Court of Session to refer the question of whether Article 50 can be unilaterally revoked to the ECJ was initially refused, before that ruling was overturned on appeal.
Two attempts by the UK government, which is contesting the case, to appeal against the referral to the European court were rejected.
Maugham said: 'I'm very pleased that the court in Luxembourg has recognised the extreme importance of its answer and its urgency for the parliament.'
Once the ECJ has delivered its ruling the case will be referred back to the Court of Session in Edinburgh, where judges are expected to 'frank' the decision and declare the European Court's answer to be the law on the matter.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.
