Backlash from Brexiteers over possible delay to final EU departure
Theresa May is facing a backlash from Brexiteers after indicating she is ready to consider extending Britain's transition out of the EU for a further year, to the end of 2021.
The prime minister told a crunch European Council summit in Brussels that she was "ready to consider" the extension floated by EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier to give time to resolve the intractable problem of the Irish border.
If agreed, the change would mean the UK remaining within the single market and customs union and subject to EU rules and regulations for almost three years after the official date of Brexit in March 2019, and more than five years after the referendum vote to Leave.
Furious Brexiteers said that the move would delay yet further the moment when the UK could sign new trade deals around the world, and would cost taxpayers billions of pounds in additional contributions to the EU.
Tory hardliner Nadine Dorries repeated her call for former Brexit secretary David Davis to replace Mrs May as leader.
You may also want to watch:
"We cannot find the money to fund our frontline police properly, we cannot find the £2bn for the vulnerable on Universal Credit, but we can mysteriously find billions to bung to the EU for the unnecessary extra year Clegg and Blair asked Barnier for to waylay Brexit," said Ms Dorries.
And Mr Davis's former chief of staff Stewart Jackson asked: "If you can't - or in the EU's case won't - resolve the backstop issue now because it's an issue of principle than why will it take another three years to resolve it? Will it not be an issue of principle once we have coughed up billions more in UK taxpayers' cash?"
- 1 The bigot we should have called out on day one
- 2 The greatest failure of government in our lifetime
- 3 Nigel Farage launches new party in Scotland to promote 'positive case for the Union'
- 4 Matt Hancock praises free school meals before being reminded he voted against them
- 5 The worryingly familiar signs for Britain's vaccine roll-out
- 6 Brexiteer MP ridiculed after calling for free movement of goods between GB and NI
- 7 Brexit changes lead to exodus of Brits from Spain, UK nationals claim
- 8 Brexiteer says he'd never have voted for Brexit 'if we knew we'd lose our jobs'
- 9 The polling that signals the plight of the Union
- 10 Fears government could scrap workers' rights in post-Brexit overhaul of labour laws
Leaders of the 27 remaining EU states ditched proposals for a special Brexit summit in November, after chief negotiator Michel Barnier told them he needed "much more time" to find a way to avoid a hard border in Ireland.
With just 160 days to go to the official date of Brexit, May urged the EU27 to find a "creative" way out of the current dilemma.
"We have shown we can do difficult deals together constructively," the PM said. "I remain confident of a good outcome."
And she told them: "The last stage will need courage, trust and leadership on both sides."
After her Chequers plan for Brexit was humiliatingly rejected in Salzburg last month and efforts to seal a last-minute deal foundered last weekend over the EU's demand for a "backstop" arrangement for Ireland, May was fighting to keep the door open for an agreement to deliver an orderly withdrawal.
EU leaders gave her 20 minutes to make her pitch before discussing Brexit in her absence over a dinner of turbot cooked in wheat beer.
The president of the European Parliament, Antonio Tajani, said: "Both sides mentioned the idea of an extension of the transition period as one possibility which is on the table and would have to be looked into."
A senior EU official later said May had indicated she was "ready to consider" a longer transition period.
May initially suggested an "implementation period" of around two years after Brexit, to give the UK's authorities and companies time to prepare for the new arrangements.
But she later accepted a 21-month transition offered by the EU, ending on the last day of December 2020.
It emerged yesterday that Barnier was ready to discuss a further year's extension to allow time to find a solution to keep the Irish border open.
UK officials stressed that the prime minister was not proposing any extension to the period already agreed.
This week's summit had been billed as "the moment of truth" when agreement was needed to allow time for ratification in the Westminster and European parliaments.
But May did not come forward with the new "concrete proposals" on the border issue which European Council president Donald Tusk said were needed to break the deadlock.
While expressing their willingness to work for an orderly UK withdrawal, a number of EU leaders said their countries were beginning preparations for a no-deal Brexit.
In a speech to the German parliament before travelling to Brussels, chancellor Angela Merkel said that the possibility of a Brexit deal was "still there", but added that Berlin was making plans for a no-deal withdrawal.
And in Paris, Emmanuel Macron's government published details of legislation to authorise preparations for a no-deal Brexit, which could see the restoration of customs checks and health inspections for animals at French ports, and even a requirement for Britons to seek visas for stays of three months or more.
Macron, who held separate talks with May ahead of the three-hour dinner, said it was time to "accelerate" talks.
But Lithuanian president Dalia Grybauskaite said there would be "no breakthrough" this week because May lacked a strong mandate from her party and parliament.
Britain needed "to decide finally what they want and to rally behind the prime minister all together, not split", she said, adding: "Today we do not know what they want. They do not know themselves what they want. It is a problem."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.