Senior Tory accused of 'Stalinism' over Brexit betrayal claims
A Tory MP and leading Brexiteer has been accused of "Stalinism" over comments attacking those who want any Brexit withdrawal agreement to be put to MPs.
Bernard Jenkin dismissed attempts to amend the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill to require the government to put any withdrawal agreement to a vote in the House saying it was "nothing but cant".
The MP for Harwich and North Essex's comments were branded "Stalinism" by Labour former minister Yvette Cooper, and Tory former minister Anna Soubry described them as "shocking".
The Maastricht Rebel said: "The whole point of this Bill is it is taking back power to this country and to this Parliament so we can decide for ourselves what will happen.
"All the significant powers in this Bill are subject to affirmative resolution and those that are not are now going to be subject to a sifting committee.
You may also want to watch:
"We are recovering from a situation where as members of the European Union we had handed over all these decisions lock, stock and barrel to the European Union.
"To dress this attempt to reverse Brexit as an argument in favour of parliamentary sovereignty is nothing but cant."
- 1 Michael Gove asked FIVE TIMES to explain what a 'substantial meal' is
- 2 BBC presenter attracts complaints after calling Brexiteers 'headbangers, zealots and quislings'
- 3 Michael Gove accused of going 'full Trump' after attacking Good Morning Britain's ratings
- 4 British expats seethe at post-Brexit travel restrictions
- 5 Keir Starmer mocks Tory heckler who said he was speaking in 'hindsight' with prediction
- 6 Brexiteer claims it will be '25 years' before UK gets sovereignty back
- 7 Netherlands causes hilarity with use of Brexit 'monster' to issue warning to citizens
- 8 Brexiteer mocked after dreaming up term to describe Britain's Covid vaccination programme
- 9 Scotland should 'aim to rejoin EU in full' after Brexit, SNP told
- 10 Michael Gove tells Piers Morgan boycotting GMB had been 'good advice'
Ms Cooper said: "Oh my, what Stalinism is this? That somehow any attempt to disagree with the way in which this Bill is drawn up is somehow a betrayal of Brexit, what rubbish.
"How insecure are members who are objecting to any changes in this Bill?
"It is Parliament's job and it is a job they argued for when they stood up and tried to defend parliamentary sovereignty.
"They argued for Parliament to take some responsibility and to do its job by scrutinising legislation."
Ms Cooper also suggested that Brexit could be delayed by a couple of months after Mr Jenkin asked what happened if a Brexit deal was reached "too late" to allow Parliament to clear through any legislation required to approve it.
Ms Cooper said she wants a transitional agreement "pinned down as early as possible" to give certainty to business, adding: "I hugely hope there will be plenty of time for all of these debates to take place.
"In the event, and the government has said it doesn't want this, against the government's will, that this ends up being a late deal then actually Parliament should have the opportunity to say to the government 'Well, ask to extend Article 50 for a couple of months' in order to be able to implement it properly.
"To be honest, the government will have to do that anyway because they will not be able to bring Clause 9 amendment and Clause 9 powers through fast enough in order to be able to do so."
Conservative Nigel Evans (Ribble Valley) later voiced concerns that Brexit could be delayed by more than two months.
The Brexiteer said: "If the treaty isn't right in the eyes of this Parliament then a couple of months could turn into a couple of years, and indeed in some cases people would like it to be a couple of decades."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.