Boris Johnson’s legacy will be defined by bluster and half-truths
- Credit: PA
Readers have their say about Boris Johnson and the government's response to the coronavirus outbreak.
It is an observable fact that organisations and even countries rapidly take on the characteristics of whoever is leading them at the time.
The UK response to the COVID-19 crisis is no exception. Bluster, half-truths, unrealistic future projections and avoidances have highlighted confused and conflicting governmental responses.
The legacy is becoming one of undelivered promises, an absence and shortage of equipment, overwhelmed hospitals and a tendency to blame the people for not following instructions.
At the same time the final coup de grâce has the government reminding us (and those beastly Europeans) in the midst of the worst crisis since the Second World War, that in the absence of 'sufficient progress' by June we will leave the European Union without a deal.
You may also want to watch:
Isle of Dogs
- 1 Brexiteer Prue Leith quits Tory Party after government votes down motion to protect UK food standards
- 2 Public slams Brexit Party tweet which shames Tory MPs who voted against free school meals
- 3 Piers Morgan must expose the government's Brexit betrayal
- 4 Group in protest against Tory MPs who voted down free school meals targets offices with empty plates
- 5 Tory minister blames journalists for NHS Test and Trace failure as he defends Dido Harding
- 6 Peers set to remove law-breaking sections of Boris Johnson's Brexit bill
- 7 Michel Barnier postpones Brussels return as Brexit trade talks in London continue
- 8 Brexit shambles: A stress of our own making
- 9 Priti Patel set to hand private firms £28 million in government contracts to deport asylum seekers from UK
- 10 Boris Johnson and Priti Patel urged to end 'attacks' on lawyers in letter by 800 legal professionals
After being asked twice if she would apologise to NHS staff and their families over the lack of 'necessary PPE', Priti Patel said: 'I'm sorry if people feel there have been failings'.
Through her pseudo-apology, what Patel seems to be basically implying, 'if people didn't feel that way, I would not apologise. Feeling that way is their problem, nothing to do with us in government'. Therefore, when she says sorry, she doesn't truly mean it.
Business secretary Alok Sharma has also said: 'I'm incredibly sorry that, you know, people feel they're not able to get this equipment.'
How can you 'feel' you're not able to get personal protective equipment? Either you can, or you can't get it!
Fake apologies sound particularly cynical in the deadly pandemic we are living through.
he government has now 'written off' a £13 billion debt, which is actually the money many argued should have gone to the NHS anyway at not much over £1bn a year.
Doing so at this stage of a pandemic doesn't lessen the damage done to frontline services during austerity.
What it does is show how quickly a
magic money tree can grow when a government needs to dig itself out of trouble.
Just as I heard that Matt Hancock was accusing NHS staff of 'over-using' or 'misusing' PPE I got a text from my middle daughter who is an A&E doctor in Liverpool.
My daughter waited a long time for the proper equipment despite being in what we refer to as the front line. She has been reusing equipment that was supposed to be single use and disposable.
More recently, staff were finally measured for proper masks and when hers arrived it was the wrong size. There was nothing else so her senior told her she had no choice but to use it.
Does Matt Hancock think that her lack of proper equipment may have contributed to the NHS now having another frontline doctor at home ill?
• Have your say by writing to email@example.com and the best will appear in print on our letters pages every Thursday.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.