Police watchdog to decide whether Boris Johnson should face criminal probe over Jennifer Arcuri links
- Credit: BBC
The police complaints body is set to assess whether he should face a criminal investigation over his links with American businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri.
The Greater London Authority (GLA) said its monitoring officer had recorded a "conduct matter" against Johnson over allegations Arcuri received favourable treatment because of her friendship with him while he was mayor of London.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) will now consider whether there are grounds to investigate the prime minister for the criminal offence of misconduct in public office.
The move was greeted with fury in Downing Street, which denounced the referral as a "nakedly political put-up job" on the eve of the Tory Party conference in Manchester as the GLA is headed by Labour mayor Sadiq Khan.
A senior government source said no evidence had been provided to support the allegations, and that the prime minister had been given no opportunity to respond prior to the release of a GLA press statement.
You may also want to watch:
"Due process has not been followed and the timing is overtly political. The public and media will rightly see through such a nakedly political put-up job," the source said.
In a statement, the GLA said that the monitoring officer, Emma Strain, had a "statutory duty" to record any conduct matters which she became aware of relating to the mayor in his role as police and crime commissioner for London.
- 1 Nigel Farage loses nearly 50,000 followers after Twitter suspends QAnon accounts
- 2 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 3 Former Brexit Party MEP dies in diving accident in the Bahamas
- 4 Bob Geldof takes swipe at No 10 saying 'lying is second nature' to them
- 5 Progressive alliance could see Labour win 351 seats at next election, new analysis reveals
- 6 The greatest failure of government in our lifetime
- 7 Boris Johnson blames seafood companies for post-Brexit sales slump
- 8 Jacob Rees-Mogg says it's 'all the EU's fault' musicians can't tour Europe
- 9 Priti Patel fails to appear in Commons to answer questions on missing police records
- 10 The bigot we should have called out on day one
"The 'conduct matter' has been recorded as allegations have been brought to the attention of the monitoring officer that Boris Johnson maintained a friendship with Jennifer Arcuri and as a result of that friendship allowed Arcuri to participate in trade missions and receive sponsorship monies in circumstances when she and her companies could not have expected otherwise to receive those benefits," the statement said.
"A 'conduct matter' exists where there is information that indicates that a criminal offence may have been committed. It does not mean that this is proved in any way.
"The IOPC will now consider if it is necessary for the matter to be investigated."
Arcuri's relationship with Johnson has been the focus of intense scrutiny, with ministers forced to deny the prime minister had any role in the awarding of £126,000 of public money to her companies.
The pair were close personal friends when Johnson was mayor of London and Arcuri went with him on three overseas trade missions. Johnson was said to be a regular visitor to her London apartment but her friends and family have denied suggestions they had an affair, insisting the daytime visits were for "technology lessons".
Johnson has consistently denied any wrongdoing.
A No 10 spokesman said: "The prime minister, as mayor of London, did a huge amount of work when selling our capital city around the world, beating the drum for London and the UK.
"Everything was done with propriety and in the normal way.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.