Major new report on Brexit and public opinion reveals a divided UK
The United Kingdom is a country profoundly divided by class, place, age and values, a comprehensive academic report on Brexit and public opinion reveals today.
The report by The UK in a Changing Europe, based at King's College London, has uncovered deep divisions in British society 19 months after the EU referendum which it warns could dramatically impact on politics in the years to come.
The report, written by some of the UK's leading academics, reveals: A generational divide which the report says "has grown even more stark following the general election and is turning into a political cleavage", New political identities as Leavers and Remainers view the world through different prisms, A growing distinction between attitudes in towns and cities Divisions between the individual nations of the UK over fundamental constitutional questions, and The emergence of a "values divide" around different attitudes to diversity
Professor Anand Menon, director of The UK in a Changing Europe, said: 'The referendum highlighted fundamental divisions in British society and superimposed a Leave-Remain distinction over them. This has the potential to profoundly disrupt our politics in the years to come.
'There's little evidence to support the prime minister's statement that 'the country has come together after Brexit'.
You may also want to watch:
"Instead she is presiding over a divided and polarised nation.'
The report highlights an emerging divide, those who thought equal opportunities for ethnic minorities had gone too far voting heavily for Leave and those who felt equal opportunities had not gone far enough much more likely to have voted Remain.
- 1 These are the 322 Tory MPs who voted against extending free school meals to children
- 2 Question Time: Ex-Tory minister accused of making 'sickening' comment about free schools meals row
- 3 Betty Boothroyd delivers scathing assessment of Boris Johnson's government
- 4 Downing Street withholds praise for business and local authorities offering free meals to hungry children
- 5 Priti Patel bullying inquiry may never be released, hints Boris Johnson's new civil service boss
- 6 House of Lords defies No 10 and votes to heavily defeat Boris Johnson's Brexit bill
- 7 Priti Patel set to hand private firms £28 million in government contracts to deport asylum seekers from UK
- 8 Boris Johnson 'plans to resign' in six months because he can't live on £150k salary
- 9 German MEP tells Boris Johnson he 'owes' Britons a Brexit deal as she urged a return to EU trade talks
- 10 At the upcoming US election, Donald Trump really is toast
The report warns that the robust link between views about ethnic equality and votes in the EU referendum could be a sign of "an emergent values divide in the UK".
The 17-chapter, 56-page report is written by 27 academics and is the most comprehensive and authoritative analysis of Brexit and public opinion to date. It analyses the referendum, last year's general election, emerging Brexit identities and the public's views of the Brexit negotiations.
It includes several arguments why its authors think it is unlikely people will change their minds about leaving the EU for three reasons. Firstly, that people's views on EU membership are tied up with values that are entrenched and unlikely to shift. Secondly, that "confirmation bias" means both Leavers and Remainers ignore information which does not correspond with their values. And thirdly, that for many Leavers the attraction of Brexit was more identity politics than economic reasons.
The report's authors include John Curtice, Matthew Goodwin, Sara Hobolt, Rob Ford, Anand Menon and Maria Sobolewska. It can be downloaded here.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.