Video
James O’Brien reveals the biggest stumbling block in Brexit talks
James O'Brien on LBC Radio. Photograph: LBC/Global. - Credit: Archant
Broadcaster James O'Brien has revealed the biggest stumbling block in Brexit talks, which is that most Brexiteers in power do not realise what they have already voted for.
As EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier confirmed that both sides are unlikely to reach agreement in time for the July deadline imposed by Downing Street, O'Brien tried to make some sense over why the prime minister's 'oven-ready' Brexit deal still had not been implemented.
The presenter said he believed one of the biggest stumbling blocks is not the lack of willingness for a deal, but the fact the Brexiteers do not realise what they have already agreed and supported so far.
He said: 'Part of the problem being, as Mark Francois demonstrated quite perfectly in a letter he wrote to Barnier recently, is that he didn't really understand what the Withdrawal Agreement had agreed to already.
'It's almost Greek in its tragedy. It got Johnson over the line, talking about an oven-ready deal and pretending that he'd managed to set up something different from what Theresa May had failed to get through the House of Commons.
'And they all got so excited and caught up in the emotion of the moment. But that Withdrawal Agreement has parts that are legally binding and the EU are not really going to step back from the bits they'd already agreed. And that's one of the reasons why things are in such a state.
You may also want to watch:
Ben Kentish, the station's political correspondent, intervened to agree. He said: 'There's bits in the political declaration that was agreed that the EU has since accused the UK of going back on. That part is not legally binding in the way the Withdrawal Agreement is. But, of course, the EU says the UK agreed to it nonetheless and it is a matter of trust and honesty that they accuse the government of backtracking on.
'The government hasn't necessarily denied that, interestingly, it hasn't denied the suggestion it is had gone back on what is in the political declaration.
Most Read
- 1 The deep roots of Labour's red wall decline
- 2 Andy Burnham urges UK to 'embrace' Brexit as 'new reality'
- 3 Labour needs more positivity, more patriotism, more policy... and less wokery
- 4 A view from inside the Heathrow petri dish
- 5 MANDRAKE: Boris Johnson's 'daughter' speaks out
- 6 Former Tory speaker admits voting Labour after labeling Boris Johnson a 'liar'
- 7 Dominic Raab 'chickened out' of a no-deal Brexit, Michel Barnier says
- 8 The truth about 'buy British'
- 9 Liz Truss accused of freeports 'catastrophic blunder' following Brexit deals
- 10 Seven reasons Scotland should stay in the Union
'The government simply say it wasn't legally binding.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.
