Government decides not to press ahead with boundary reforms due to Brexit workload
- Credit: PA Wire/PA Images
Despite insisting Brexit was 'done' and now being able to get on with other things, the government now admits the workload will prevent them pressing ahead with boundary reforms.
The idea to cut MPs by 50 was first proposed by David Cameron when he was prime minister but now is set to be dropped by Boris Johnson's goernment.
Constitution minister Chloe Smith confirmed there had been a 'change in policy', which would have resulted in a number of high-profile MPs losing their seats as part of the Boundary Commission's shake-up, including Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and ex-Brexit secretary David Davis.
Some pollsters predicted that the radical reshaping of the electoral map could have even put the prime minister's own seat of Uxbridge and South Ruislip at risk at the next election.
Cabinet Office minister Smith said the government remained committed to creating constituencies with near-equal numbers of voters but that it was 'sensible' for there to continue to be 650 MPs.
You may also want to watch:
In a written statement, the Conservative MP wrote: 'The government is minded to instead make provision for the number of parliamentary constituencies to remain at 650.
'This is a change in policy from the position previously legislated for under the coalition government.
- 1 German MEP tells Boris Johnson he 'owes' Britons a Brexit deal as she urged a return to EU trade talks
- 2 Betty Boothroyd delivers scathing assessment of Boris Johnson's government
- 3 Tory minister branded 'disgraceful' after dismissing child hunger in Britain as something that has 'been going on for years'
- 4 UK Business leaders describe Brexit call with Boris Johnson and Michael Gove as 'pointless'
- 5 Fool's gold? Nigel Farage wants you to invest your trust in his financial advice service
- 6 Boris Johnson 'plans to resign' in six months because he can't live on £150k salary
- 7 House of Lords defies No 10 and votes to heavily defeat Boris Johnson's Brexit bill
- 8 The deep roots of Dominic Cummings' personal antipathy to the BBC
- 9 PMQs Review: The one where it was grim up north
- 10 Petition launched to officially name Kent lorry park after Nigel Farage
'Since that policy was established in the coalition agreement, the United Kingdom has now left the European Union.
'The UK parliament will have a greater workload now we are taking back control and regaining our political and economic independence.
'It is therefore sensible for the number of parliamentary constituencies to remain at 650.'
She revealed that the government, as well as bringing forward legislation to block the implementation of the 2018 overhaul, would call for boundary reviews to take place every eight years rather than every five.
It would mean boundaries would be in place for at least two general elections before being reconsidered.
The four constituencies which were protected from plans to re-organise electorate numbers - Orkney and Shetland, Na h-Eileanan an Iar, and two seats for the Isle of Wight - will continue to have special status, Ms Smith said.
The Electoral Reform Society said cutting the number of MPs would have shifted the power balance in ministers' favour.
Chief executive Darren Hughes said: 'Plans to cut voters' representation in the Commons would have undermined the voices of ordinary people in Parliament and hurt democratic scrutiny.
'The proposals always seemed more like an executive power grab than a genuine move to improve the function of the Commons, so this is a small but welcome victory for backbenchers and voters.
'Without shrinking the size of the government, cutting MPs would have done little more than enhance the already disproportionate power of ministers.'
The campaign group urged the government to turn its attention to 'reducing the number of unelected peers in the bloated House of Lords' once the coronavirus pandemic is over.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.