Letters: A fresh referendum would return another close result
- Credit: PA Wire/PA Images
I'm concerned that so far, too few Leavers seem to have changed their minds and holding a second referendum before the time is right may be counterproductive.
I suspect that right now the best that could be expected would be a mirror-image of two years ago – 52/48 for Remain. The whole issue of Brexit
would then become an ongoing, running sore.
Too many Brexit supporters want to be 'free' of the EU regardless of cost and have a blind faith in that we will strike lucrative new trade deals. They believe the lie of 'how easy it will all be'.
I regret to say that I think it will take a multinational corporation like Nissan or Airbus to actually move to mainland Europe for the message to sink in and become reality.
You may also want to watch:
- 1 Why don't Brexiteers like to talk about Brexit any more?
- 2 Michael O'Leary: My hope for the future over Brexit
- 3 Brexit: British 'expats' in Spain facing deportation over residency
- 4 Five years of Brexit summed up by Cold War Steve
- 5 When Eton took on a team of miners at football
- 6 Did Donald Trump really wear his trousers backwards at Republicans' North Carolina rally?
- 7 English to be temporarily replaced by French as EU's 'working language' in 2022
- 8 Priti Patel urged to publish promised assessment on impact of ending freedom of movement
- 9 Is the Sun setting on Murdoch's global media empire?
- 10 Britain is becalmed by apathy: Where is the rage?
Discussion about a second referendum prompted me to look at the situation surrounding the last one.
The House of Lords Constitution Committee, in its report on referendums in 2010, gave us fair warning of what could go wrong: 'There are significant drawbacks to the use of referendums. In particular, we regret the ad hoc manner in which referendums have been used, often as a tactical device, by the government of the day ... We recognise that because of the sovereignty of parliament, referendums cannot be legally binding in the UK, and are therefore advisory.'
And, presciently, 'we are concerned about the effectiveness of the regulation of information provision in UK referendums. We commend the model provided by the 1992-3 electoral reform referendums in New Zealand when an independent body provided information and ran the public education process'.
Bexhill on Sea
• Let us know your thoughts. The New European publishes two pages of letters every week. Send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.