‘Too many were after Theresa May’s blood’ - Former cabinet minister on how Tories ‘sabotaged’ her leadership
- Credit: PA
A former Tory minister has said the party's MPs seriously undermined Theresa May's attempts to broker a Brexit deal with the EU.
Former prime minister Theresa May was standing on a rock in the middle of a minefield after Chequers and knew she could not keep standing, former justice secretary David Gauke said.
Gauke, who had the Tory whip removed after he voted against Boris Johnson's Brexit deal, said May was not hugely engaging with cabinet ministers.
You may also want to watch:
The ex-minister, who lost his seat in the 2019 election when standing for re-election as an independent candidate, added that there were things he and others did that they may not have done if they had been fully confident in which direction May was heading.
- 1 Brexiteer Prue Leith quits Tory Party after government votes down motion to protect UK food standards
- 2 Public slams Brexit Party tweet which shames Tory MPs who voted against free school meals
- 3 Piers Morgan must expose the government's Brexit betrayal
- 4 Group in protest against Tory MPs who voted down free school meals targets offices with empty plates
- 5 Peers set to remove law-breaking sections of Boris Johnson's Brexit bill
- 6 Tory minister blames journalists for NHS Test and Trace failure as he defends Dido Harding
- 7 Michel Barnier postpones Brussels return as Brexit trade talks in London continue
- 8 Brexit shambles: A stress of our own making
- 9 Priti Patel set to hand private firms £28 million in government contracts to deport asylum seekers from UK
- 10 Boris Johnson and Priti Patel urged to end 'attacks' on lawyers in letter by 800 legal professionals
After a marathon session of talks at Chequers, the prime minister's official country residence, on July 6 2018, May and her Cabinet managed to hammer out a Brexit plan which she could take to the EU.
The plan would see the UK remain closely tied to Brussels on goods and agriculture, with the creation of a 'common rulebook', but was dismissed by EU leaders.
Tories on both wings of the party then openly called on her to ditch the plan, with former cabinet minister David Davis and current prime minister Boris Johnson resigning in protest at the proposal and calling on May to 'chuck Chequers' and seek a looser trade deal like Canada's.
Speaking to the Institute for Government as part of its Ministers Reflect series, Gauke said May's position had been made impossible by the point at which she chose to resign, with her leadership on the downturn after the Chequers debacle.
He said: 'Every move that Theresa made, she was sort of standing on a rock in the middle of a minefield and she knew she couldn't keep standing on the rock for much longer.
'Every step she could take had enormous peril, and, at that point, apart from the fact that Brexit was consuming more and more time, for all of us, certainly most of my time and intellectual energy was going into the Brexit debate, rather than departmental business.'
Asked if May was engaging with the cabinet, Gauke added: 'Not a huge amount from cabinet ministers, I think.
'We did have meetings with her, and conference calls and so on. But she wasn't hugely keen to find herself constantly sat in a room with five cabinet ministers on one side of the argument, saying you need to do this, and then ending that meeting and having a meeting with five cabinet ministers from the other side, saying you need to do that. I think I can understand her reluctance to do that.
'There were certain times where we demand meetings and sitting in a room to speak and get that.
'I think it would be fair to say our experience of her - and I think the other side would have made the same point - was that it's very hard to really know where she was.
'I think, particularly as we got through February and March last year, there were decisions that we made that perhaps, if we had just been more confident as to where she was going to end up, there were things that I and others did that maybe we wouldn't have done if we'd been fully confident in which direction she was going to jump.
'I think the point where she resigned, her job had been made impossible. There were too many of my former colleagues who were after her blood.
'And, for some time, she'd been in this position where she was on the rock in the minefield and then she decided to get off the rock and make a run for it, and unfortunately the inevitable happened. It just felt that it was somehow always going to happen.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.