Why doesn’t Richard Burgon get it?
- Credit: PA
DON BRIND on why the next Labour leader needs to shift the party position to ensure it has a future.
My old boss, the BBC political editor John Cole, had a perceptive test of political leadership. Good leaders, he said, had to be ready to "chip away at the prejudices of their followers".
It looks as though Lisa Nandy gets it. "Steadying the ship isn't enough. Labour needs to change or it will die", she says. Richard Burgon doesn't.
You may also want to watch:
Richard blames everybody but Jeremy Corbyn for Labour disastrous defeat last December. Deputy leadership contender Burgon is the true continuity Corbyn candidate. He launched his signature Peace Pledge policy, which gives Labour members a veto over military action by a Labour government, with Corbyn by his side.
- 1 Susanna Reid takes on Priti Patel over government's gaslighting of public on coronavirus
- 2 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 3 Brexiteer musician accused of hypocrisy after demanding No 10 help bands with EU visa
- 4 PMQs: Ben Bradshaw calls out Boris Johnson over Brexit lies
- 5 Priti Patel fails to appear in Commons to answer questions on missing police records
- 6 Piers Morgan calls on Priti Patel to resign over missing crime records fiasco
- 7 ‘Don’t haste ye back’ - Nicola Sturgeon's perfect farewell message to Donald Trump
- 8 The bigot we should have called out on day one
- 9 Kwasi Kwarteng confirms post-Brexit review of workers' rights
- 10 Iain Duncan Smith defends calling Donald Trump 'a decent man'
Corbyn, who has a streak of vanity which makes him concerned for his leadership legacy, was taking a bit of a risk with his endorsement. Burgon faces a drubbing. He scored just 15% in a YouGov poll of Labour members a month ago. My sense is that vigorous campaigning by Rosena Alin Khan, Ian Murray and Dawn Butler could push him lower.
That would be good news for the leadership favourite Keir Starmer -- if he is willing to take on the John Cole task of chipping away at followers prejudices. But is he?
An interesting declaration of support for Starmer has come from Laura Parker, formerly Jeremy Corbyn's political secretary and then national coordinator of Momentum.
She praises Starmer's "unequivocal commitment to preserving our core policies".
But she writes she will be on the lookout for any backsliding. "In defending the transformative economic agenda upon which he stood as a shadow cabinet member in 2019, I trust that Keir means what he has written in his ten pledges to us. It would be self-defeating for him to say one thing then act otherwise."
Parker adds, "One of the lessons we all - leadership candidates, MPs and members - have just learnt the hardest way is that a perceived lack of authenticity is fatal. I am confident that under his leadership, we can build an enduring coalition."
Other Corbyn loyalists are deeply distrustful of Starmer and of Lisa Nandy. The charge is led by Matt Wrack, leader of the Fire Brigades Union in a video which highlights their resignation from the Shadow Cabinet in 2016 following the referendum - what Corbynistas call the "chicken coup."
Starmer's ten pledges are clearly designed to reassure former Corbyn supporters that he supports the "core values" and radical policies developed in recent years.
But as he seeks to win over the electorate, rather than the party, he is likely to face some testing choices. To have the authority to make necessary changes, he needs a victory as decisive as the new YouGov poll suggests he is heading for.
- Don Brind is a former BBC political correspont and a press officer for the Labour Movement for Europe. This article first appeared on its website here.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.