China ‘exonerate’ dead doctor who led warnings about coronavirus
Dr Li Wenliang pictured in hospital during the coronavirus outbreak. Photograph: Wikipedia. - Credit: Archant
The Chinese government has exonerated a doctor who was officially reprimanded for warning about the coronavirus outbreak and later died of the disease.
Police in December reprimanded eight doctors, including Dr Li Wenliang, for warning friends on social media about the emerging threat.
China's supreme court later criticised the police, but the ruling party continued to tighten its grip on information about the outbreak.
The move is a startling admission of error by the ruling Communist Party, which generally tolerates no challenges to its authority.
The party's top disciplinary body said the Wuhan police force had revoked its admonishment of Dr Li that had included a threat of arrest.
You may also want to watch:
It also said a 'solemn apology' had been issued to Dr Li's family and that two police officers, identified only by their surnames, had been issued 'disciplinary punishments' for the original handling of the matter.
In death, Dr Li became the face of simmering anger at the Communist Party's controls over information, and of complaints that officials lie about disease outbreaks, industrial accidents, natural disasters and financial frauds, while punishing whistleblowers and independent journalists.
Most Read
- 1 Nigel Farage loses nearly 50,000 followers after Twitter suspends QAnon accounts
- 2 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 3 Former Brexit Party MEP dies in diving accident in the Bahamas
- 4 Bob Geldof takes swipe at No 10 saying 'lying is second nature' to them
- 5 Progressive alliance could see Labour win 351 seats at next election, new analysis reveals
- 6 The greatest failure of government in our lifetime
- 7 Boris Johnson blames seafood companies for post-Brexit sales slump
- 8 Jacob Rees-Mogg says it's 'all the EU's fault' musicians can't tour Europe
- 9 Priti Patel fails to appear in Commons to answer questions on missing police records
- 10 The bigot we should have called out on day one
The party has faced similar accusations of bungling or thuggish behaviour following previous disasters.
They include the 2003 outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), a 2005 chemical spill that disrupted water supplies to millions of people in China's northeast, sales of tainted milk that sickened thousands of children, and the failure of private finance companies after the global economic crisis.
In each case, officials were accused of trying to conceal or delay information people said they needed to protect themselves.
The party often responds by allowing the public to vent temporarily, then uses its control of media and the internet to stifle criticism. Critics who persist can be jailed on vague charges of spreading rumours or making trouble.
The treatment of Dr Li's case may reflect concerns among the leadership about public anger over the failure to properly honour the sacrifices of front-line health workers while praising the party and its head, Xi Jinping, who has tightened controls on society since taking power in 2012.
The most powerful Chinese leader since at least the 1980s, Mr Xi gave himself the option of remaining president for life by changing the Chinese constitution in 2018 to remove a two-term limit.
In Wuhan, local leaders were accused of telling doctors in December not to publicise the spreading virus in order to avoid casting a shadow over the annual meeting of a local legislative body.
As the virus spread, doctors were ordered to delete posts on social media that appealed for donations of medical supplies. That prompted complaints authorities were more worried about image than public safety.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.