Dublin slams Davis’ ‘bizarre’ Brexit claims
- Credit: PA Wire/PA Images
London and Dublin have clashed over whether the Brexit agreement intended to trigger trade talks is legally binding or not.
The dispute was sparked when Brexit Secretary David Davis insisted it was much more a statement of intent than 'legally enforceable'.
The Irish government responded strongly, stating the deal was 'binding' and it would hold the UK 'to account' on it.
The document on legacy issues like the Irish border was hammered out in order to allow the remaining EU27 states to approve Brexit talks shifting to a phase two trade negotiation at a summit this week where Dublin wields a veto.
Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar heralded the last-minute deal meant to prevent the return of a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic as 'politically bullet-proof' and 'cast iron'.
You may also want to watch:
The Irish government's chief whip, Joe McHugh, branded the Brexit Secretary's comments as 'bizarre'.
He told RTE: 'We will as a government, a sovereign government in Ireland, be holding the United Kingdom to account, as will the European Union.
- 1 These are the 322 Tory MPs who voted against extending free school meals to children
- 2 Priti Patel set to hand private firms £28 million in government contracts to deport asylum seekers from UK
- 3 Betty Boothroyd delivers scathing assessment of Boris Johnson's government
- 4 Brexit shambles: A stress of our own making
- 5 Michael Gove's Brexit fantasy is leading us down a perilous path
- 6 Boris Johnson 'plans to resign' in six months because he can't live on £150k salary
- 7 German MEP tells Boris Johnson he 'owes' Britons a Brexit deal as she urged a return to EU trade talks
- 8 How the Daily Star became Boris Johnson's biggest critic
- 9 Question Time: Ex-Tory minister accused of making 'sickening' comment about free schools meals row
- 10 'Shameful' Tory minister defends government memo attacking Marcus Rashford's free school meals call
'My question to anybody within the British Government would be, why would there be an agreement, a set of principled agreements, in order to get to phase two, if they weren't going to be held up? That just sounds bizarre to me.
'This, as far as we're concerned, is a binding agreement, an agreement in principle.'
McHugh said the Irish government would not 'back away' from the Brexit principles if it comes under pressure from the rest of the EU during trade talks with the UK.
In the wake of some Brexiteers expressing concern the agreement said the UK would have 'full alignment' with the EU on regulations and standards that impacted on Northern Ireland, Davis told BBC1's The Andrew Marr Show: 'This was a statement of intent more than anything else.
'Much more a statement of intent than it was a legally enforceable thing.'
The comments came after reports that some hardline Brexiteers had been assured by the Government that the term full alignment was 'meaningless'.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.