DUP insists it’s not divided on Withdrawal Agreement after Arlene Foster contradicts MP
- Credit: PA
The DUP has insisted the party is not divided on the Northern Ireland protocol after leader Arlene Foster appeared to contradict a senior MP.
Scrutiny of the DUP's stance has intensified as speculation continues over the Government's apparent desire to use domestic legislation to override elements of the contentious protocol.
On Monday night the DUP issued a statement saying the Withdrawal Agreement must be scrapped or changed to ensure Northern Ireland's place within the Union is protected.
You may also want to watch:
However, in an interview aired on Friday Arlene Foster said she had to 'recognise the reality' that the agreement is now law and she has to be part of the process that sees the Northern Ireland protocol implemented.
- 1 Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid reject Boris Johnson's coronavirus claim
- 2 Sky News presenter says Boris Johnson is 'gaslighting the nation' over Covid claims
- 3 Nigel Farage reminded of claim that 'acid test of Brexit' surrounds fishing after clip resurfaces
- 4 Pro-Brexit fishing campaigner says Boris Johnson's deal has left her with 'no fish'
- 5 Home Office launches voluntary repatriation scheme for EU nationals
- 6 PMQs: Boris Johnson calls for apology from Keir Starmer over coronavirus stances
- 7 Jeremy Corbyn loses bid to release Labour documents ahead of High Court battle
- 8 Brussels politician says Boris Johnson should 'pay for EU workers to stay' in UK
- 9 Boris Johnson is the 'worst PM' and should resign, says Alastair Campbell
- 10 European parliament agrees to add British overseas territories to post-Brexit tax haven blacklist
In an interview with Sky News, she said: 'I mean, there are some who would continue to fight against the protocol; I have to recognise that is the reality now.'
Under the protocol agreed by the EU and UK in the withdrawal deal, Northern Ireland will continue to follow single market rules for goods and administer the EU's customs code at its ports.
It was designed to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland, but unionists have been vehemently opposed to it, insisting it instead creates an economic border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.
The government's critics have accused it of bad faith after it was reported that it would seek to use Westminster legislation to changes aspects of the protocol related to state aid and customs administration.
But Sir Jeffrey Donaldson maintained there was 'only one train of thought' among his colleagues on the Brexit withdrawal deal amid questions around seemingly contrasting positions in his party.
'We hope this bill will now address some of the key issues that present a real challenge for business in Northern Ireland if the EU are to have its way,' he said.
Asked if his party leader had a different view, he told BBC Radio Ulster: 'There's only one train of thought in the DUP and that is reflected in the statement published last night, which was agreed by the party leader and by our leadership team generally.'
He insisted Foster's comments did not relate to the prospect of a customs border in the Irish Sea.
'We've rejected that completely and will continue to oppose vigorously any move to create a customs border in the Irish Sea because it would be harmful for businesses, but also it would drive up the cost to the consumer in Northern Ireland and that is unacceptable,' said the Lagan Valley MP.
'Arlene was very clear that we have and continue to oppose the elements of the Northern Ireland protocol that would require a customs border in the Irish Sea.
'That has consistently been our position and that position won't be changing. It is unacceptable.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.