Esther McVey 'didn't understand how Brexit works'
Work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had to be corrected at a cabinet meeting after arguing talks over parts of Britain's EU withdrawal agreement should be concluded once it had actually left, it has been claimed.
The Times has reported that three sources had said that McVey had been corrected by the prime minister after apparently misunderstanding how the Brexit process worked.
Britain will only be granted a transition by the European Union once it has agreed the Northern Ireland backstop, the future rights of EU and UK citizens and the £39bn divorce bill.
Under EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier's mantra 'nothing is agreed until everything is agreed', a transition deal would collapse if any of these issues were not signed off by both parties.
One source told the newspaper: 'Esther did not appear to understand what she was saying. Quite a few people including the PM immediately jumped in to correct the misunderstanding.'
McVey's spokeswoman said that the claim was a 'load of rubbish'.
You may also want to watch:
- 1 The stench of scandal seeping out from Britain
- 2 Why is devout Jacob Rees-Mogg so quiet about Boris Johnson's affairs?
- 3 Major and Blair were right about Brexit and Northern Ireland
- 4 Dominic Cummings' new venture could cause concern for No 10
- 5 Roman Kemp: Depression and coping with George Michael's death
- 6 The symbolism behind the reopening of pubs
- 7 Why are there so few BAME faces on the fronts of our newspapers?
- 8 Government deletes pro-Scottish independence blog post
- 9 David Cameron and Matt Hancock discussed NHS scheme over 'private drink'
- 10 PM chooses not to attend Prince Philip’s funeral because of guest limits
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.