Facebook pulls government adverts after accusations of misusing taxpayers’ money
A promotion for the government's 'My Town' scheme. Photograph: Government. - Credit: Archant
Facebook has pulled a series of government adverts in swing constituencies after accusations it had misused taxpayers' money to target voters.
At least 17 adverts promising up to £25 million investment in various towns across the UK went live on Tuesday - the day the general election was announced.
They are part of My Town, a government-backed campaign that seeks residents' views on how to improve their towns.
The adverts ran without a political disclaimer, and were taken down by Facebook shortly after 8.30pm on Friday evening.
They targeted voters in marginal seats, such as Newcastle-under-Lyme, which has a Labour majority of just 30 votes.
You may also want to watch:
Other towns where the Facebook ads appeared included Northampton, Milton Keynes and Mansfield - which had majorities of less than 2,000 in the 2017 general election.
The adverts went live on the day prime minister Boris Johnson secured support for a general election.
Most Read
- 1 Boris Johnson warned majority will be 'wiped out' over treatment towards north of England
- 2 Boris Johnson 'frantically repositioning' himself for Donald Trump to lose election
- 3 UKIP set to select 'Dr Gammons' as candidate for London mayoral election
- 4 James Cleverly mocked after telling people to 'look at how they're doing in Wales'
- 5 Piers Morgan must expose the government's Brexit betrayal
- 6 Minister says Dido Harding is working '19-hours a day' on Test and Trace
- 7 Third Tory MP who rejected extending free school meals is targeted with local protests
- 8 Second shop owner bans Tory MPs who voted against free school meals motion
- 9 Brexiteer Prue Leith quits Tory Party after government votes down motion to protect UK food standards
- 10 Matt Hancock's NHS message backfires after appearing in hospital without a face mask
Labour MP Ian Lucas called the adverts an "outrageous" misuse of public funds and has written to Michael Gove questioning how much money was spent and how decisions were made over who to target.
The adverts went live when it became clear a December election would take place, but before the government entered purdah - the pre-election period where it must remain neutral.
Ian Lucas told PA: "They were put up on the day the government indicated we would be having a general election.
"To say the government did not know is an insult to our intelligence.
"This is public money. This is taxpayers' money. If the Conservatives want to run a political campaign, they should be doing it themselves with their own money.
"It's entirely inappropriate to be using public money in this way. They are pretending these are public information ads but they are not.
"We need to know how they have chosen to target these towns. What do they mean 'exposure to Brexit'? Surely everywhere is exposed to Brexit.
"Where have they got this data from? Have they used the data from other Government-run campaigns - like Prepare for Brexit - and are now using it for political purposes?"
A government spokesperson said: "These posts were published before the election was called and parliament has not yet been dissolved.
"All towns selected were chosen according to the same selection methodology, including analysis of deprivation, exposure to Brexit, productivity, economic resilience and investment opportunities."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.
