Cox: Motion requesting ‘full and final’ legal advice was ‘too vague’
- Credit: PA Wire/PA Images
The attorney general has written to the speaker to claim a motion requesting 'full and final' legal advice on Brexit was too 'vague' to comply.
The attorney general said that the amended terms of Sir Keir Starmer's successful motion were 'extremely vague and it is not clear what is meant by them'.
Among his concerns were whether 'advice' referred to guidance given both orally and in written form, and what was meant by 'full and final'.
He added: 'Unless there is clarity on these questions it is simply not possible for the government to know how to comply with the motion.
'It is particularly important that if anyone is to face sanctions for contempt he or she should fairly know how to comply with it.'
You may also want to watch:
It appears to be a new argument compared to what was argued in the House of Commons shortly before the letter was written.
Cox said that the issue should be referred to the privileges committee for investigation, and that it should also look at how MPs can use 'humble address' motions to force publication of confidential documents.
- 1 US election result could spark 'end of Brexit', claims peer
- 2 Brexiteer says EU 'spiteful' to end fast-track lanes for Brits after Brexit
- 3 STAR TURNS: Bond star haunted by school tragedy
- 4 'Assorted caviar' and 'board games' - Gifts confiscated from Boris Johnson due to anti-corruption laws
- 5 Farage says he can dodge US travel ban because he's a 'journalist'
- 6 Question Time: Tory minister told 'diverse' cabinet doesn't erase race issues in party
- 7 Former Labour MP tells Jeremy Corbyn to retire after being suspended from party
- 8 Poll puts Labour on highest level of support since 2014
- 9 Nigel Farage places £10,000 bet on Donald Trump to win second White House term
- 10 Donald Trump supporters duped into thanking 'Satan' for backing president's re-election campaign
He added that he believed the government had 'gone out of its way' to satisfy Parliament's motion.
Finally he called on John Bercow to explain what would happen if the opposition parties' motion is carried.
Signed by all five opposition parties including the DUP, it states: 'This House finds ministers in contempt for their failure to comply with the requirements of the motion for return passed on 13 November 2018, to publish the final and full legal advice provided by the attorney general to the cabinet concerning the EU withdrawal agreement and the framework for the future relationship, and orders its immediate publication.'
Sir Keir Starmer said the government has ignored opposition motions 'for months', adding this tactic has 'got them into very deep water indeed'.
He added: 'The reality is yet again, by its amendment, the government is simply playing for time in the hope that this ends up in the long grass until the crucial vote is long gone.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.