New study finds working class men have the most to lose from Brexit
- Credit: PA Archive/PA Images
Working class British men that voted overwhelmingly for Leave will be hit hardest by Brexit, a new study has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) found that males with GCSE qualifications or below are more likely than other groups to work in industries at extreme risk from new trade barriers with the EU after the UK leaves.
The IFS says clothing manufacture, transport equipment, car manufacturing and the chemicals and pharmaceuticals sectors are most 'exposed', given they sell a large amount of their output to the EU.
Agnes Norris Keiller, co-author of the report and economist at IFS, said: 'If barriers to trade with the EU increase, particularly the sort of 'non-tariff' barriers created by customs checks and regulatory divergence, then some sectors of the economy will be affected more than others.
'Parts of the manufacturing sector are likely to be hardest hit. As a result, the jobs or wages of men with low formal qualifications working in certain manual occupations may be under particular threat.
You may also want to watch:
'These are the sorts of workers who are most likely to find it hard to adapt and to find new roles that are equally well paid elsewhere.'
Data from Ipsos Mori suggests the majority of these working class British males with no qualifications voted for Leave in the referendum.
The report comes after Nissan warned a hard Brexit will have 'serious implications' for the car-maker's Sunderland factory.
- 1 Empty shelves are partly down to Brexit - but Leavers won't admit it
- 2 The Prime Minister is out of his league
- 3 The Spanish village with the mythical blue lagoon
- 4 Party politics will not save us from the Tories - we need drastic action
- 5 Rabbits defeat French army
- 6 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 7 Would Javid have renamed ICU wards 'Drama Queen Zones'?
- 8 Ed Vaizey overtakes Paul Dacre in the Ofcom race
- 9 Priti Patel - the poster girl for our poisonous politics
- 10 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
3.7 million workers in the UK are employed in industries the IFS classifies as 'very highly exposed' - sectors estimated to lose more than 5% of their value if trade with the EU was on WTO rules.
Nearly 20% of men with low levels of formal qualifications work in these industries compared with 15% of highly educated men and less than 10% of highly educated women.
'Men with fewer educational qualifications in Northern Ireland and the West Midlands may be particularly exposed,' the IFS said.
Workers in process, plant and machine operative occupations - roughly half a million people - are also at risk.
'This should be a matter of particular concern for policymakers,' the IFS said, as these workers tend to be older and are more likely to have skills specific to their current roles and industries of employment.
'As a result, they may find it particularly difficult to move to as well-paid employment in less adversely affected industries.'
David Lammy, Best for Britain spokesperson and Labour MP, called on the prime minister to halt Brexit.
He said: 'Many explained Brexit as the gut reaction of workers to the loss of traditional working class jobs following technological advances and globalisation. The sad irony is that Brexit will make the situation worse for British manufacturing industry and the hardworking families who depend on it.
'In the Prime Minister's speech to Conservative Party conference, she warned against 'bogus solutions that would make things worse.' Theresa May knows that there is no greater example of a bogus solution than Brexit. It is nothing more than snake oil that will deepen poverty and inequality across Britain.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.