Damning report shows Boris Johnson and Theresa May exposed civil service during Brexit talks
- Credit: Archant
A report has slammed prime minister Boris Johnson and his predecessor prime minister Theresa May for failing to defend the civil service from MPs and media scrutiny during Brexit negotiations.
The Institute for Government, a governance think tank, revealed that both leaders put advisors and other civil service in difficult positions.
The report stated that Theresa May allowed her Europe advisor Olly Robbins to become a 'target' for political attacks while Boris Johnson put officials under the 'immensely difficult position' of potentially breaking the law to leave the EU without a deal on October 31 last year.
You may also want to watch:
It also said the civil service failed to properly warn ministers of the consequences behind delaying key decisions and the impact of a no-deal Brexit on Northern Ireland.
- 1 Brexiteer Prue Leith quits Tory Party after government votes down motion to protect UK food standards
- 2 Public slams Brexit Party tweet which shames Tory MPs who voted against free school meals
- 3 Piers Morgan must expose the government's Brexit betrayal
- 4 Group in protest against Tory MPs who voted down free school meals targets offices with empty plates
- 5 Peers set to remove law-breaking sections of Boris Johnson's Brexit bill
- 6 Tory minister blames journalists for NHS Test and Trace failure as he defends Dido Harding
- 7 Michel Barnier postpones Brussels return as Brexit trade talks in London continue
- 8 Brexit shambles: A stress of our own making
- 9 Priti Patel set to hand private firms £28 million in government contracts to deport asylum seekers from UK
- 10 Boris Johnson and Priti Patel urged to end 'attacks' on lawyers in letter by 800 legal professionals
'The civil service was unable to influence the pace of political decision making on critical issues,' it stated.
'The lack of a clear plan hampered the huge job of practical preparations.
'As indecision and division grew under Theresa May, the civil service worked hard to offer new policies in the hope of keeping both sides of the cabinet happy or to use ambiguous wording to defer conflict.
'But it was unable to broker compromise. Instead, critical decisions were deferred for too long, options were never ruled out and preparations for the huge practical realities of Brexit were held back - leaving the UK underprepared ahead of key deadlines.'
Analysts were also highly critical of Theresa May's time in Downing Street, insisting her reluctance to move the Brexit process forward opened up a 'vacuum' that not only engulfed cabinet but the whole of Westminster.
'Those suspicious of the civil service's role in the EU referendum campaign used this vacuum to deliver increasingly public attacks on individual civil servants, in particular May's chief negotiator, Sir Oliver (Olly) Robbins. Both May and Johnson failed to offer any significant protection.'
Concerning Johnson's handling of negotiations on the future of Northern Ireland, analysts were just as scathing.
'The Johnson government - both ministers and senior officials - claimed to be ready to leave the EU without a withdrawal agreement but failed to address, or admit, the economic and political implications for the people and businesses of Northern Ireland,' it wrote.
The report called for Whitehall to invest time and resources in their relationships with the devolved governments and to work more closely with business ahead of the end of the Brexit transition period.
Maddy Thimont Jack from the Institute for Government said: 'The task [of Brexit] is still not complete and the tensions that Brexit exposed - particularly, between ministers and officials - have not necessarily gone away.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.