Letter: Stop looking at the rear view mirror and focus on the cliff edge ahead
- Credit: PA Wire/PA Images
Both sides of Brexit think the BBC is biased towards the other side, as Chris Grey's excellent piece points out. This may indicate that the Beeb is doing the right thing.
So let's just cut to the chase and stop hammering the BBC for showing or not showing any partiality during the referendum debate.
What we should be expending our energies and resources on is ensuring that the BBC and is fully accountable in reporting on the lies of the Brexit campaign that are now coming to light (their coverage of the Cambridge Analytica and Aggregate IQ scandal has been woefully poor), that any unfairness or illegalities of their campaign are brought to light, and that if it is confirmed that the Brexit campaign was won illegitimately then we must have a proper debate on the final outcome, and a chance to have our say on whether we want to accept the terms of Brexit.
Do let's stop looking at the rear view mirror and focus on the cliff edge ahead!
Raxa Mehta, London E14
You may also want to watch:
There is one area of broadcasting where the BBC can never hope to meet its 'strict requirements reflecting the vote share of political parties in the number of appearances across news and political programming'( James Ball, TNE #90).
- 1 Susanna Reid takes on Priti Patel over government's gaslighting of public on coronavirus
- 2 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 3 Brexiteer musician accused of hypocrisy after demanding No 10 help bands with EU visa
- 4 PMQs: Ben Bradshaw calls out Boris Johnson over Brexit lies
- 5 ‘Don’t haste ye back’ - Nicola Sturgeon's perfect farewell message to Donald Trump
- 6 Piers Morgan calls on Priti Patel to resign over missing crime records fiasco
- 7 Tory MPs vote down Lords bid to protect NHS from post-Brexit trade deals
- 8 9 of the best tweets of Donald Trump leaving the White House
- 9 Boris Johnson narrowly avoids defeat over vote on trade deals with genocidal regimes
- 10 Priti Patel fails to appear in Commons to answer questions on missing police records
That area is proceedings in parliament. To give one example: the Liberal Democrats hold 'just 12 of 650 parliamentary seats and just 7% of the national vote share'. But 7% of 650 is 45, not 12. So in its broadcasts of the elected component of parliament (the important bit), the BBC must fail to reflect the national vote share of the Liberal Democrats as 12 is to 45.
UKIP must get an even worse deal, having no MPs at all despite its significant national vote share.
How is it that the publicly-funded broadcaster is strictly required to reflect the vote share of political parties and the publicly-funded national legislature, where the political parties do their stuff (if they can get near it), isn't?
• Send your letters for publication to email@example.com
MORE: Subscribe to The New European for six weeks for just £1MORE: By bullying institutions like the BBC, critics are taking their lead from TrumpMORE: Brexit bias? Attacks on the BBC are a classic case of misdirectionMORE: No, I won't stop my attacks on the biased BBC