Jacob Rees-Mogg leads hardline Tory revolt against "softly boiled" Brexit
Theresa May faces a battle to win over her party after Jacob Rees-Mogg began the revolt against what he called her "softly boiled" Brexit.
The prime minister's plan, which will be assessed by the EU, would result in the creation of a new UK-EU free trade area for goods, with a "common rulebook".
A new "facilitated customs arrangement" would remove the need for checks and controls by treating the UK and EU as if they were a "combined customs territory".
Mrs May managed to secure agreement with her Cabinet, including its Brexiteers, after a marathon session of talks at Chequers yesterday.
But as details of the agreement emerged, Tory hardliners warned Mrs May they might not accept a plan which they claim saw her "red lines" turn pink.
You may also want to watch:
The common rulebook for goods, including food and agricultural products, could limit the UK's ability to strike trade deals with countries such as the US, for whom securing market access for American farmers would be a big prize for Trump-admiring Brexiteers.
Jacob Rees-Mogg, leader of the hardline European Research Group of Hard Brexiteer Tory MPs, demanded Mrs May gave him more details of what had been agreed.
- 1 Jacob Rees-Mogg says it's 'all the EU's fault' musicians can't tour Europe
- 2 Piers Morgan tells Gavin Williamson to resign for being a 'catastrophe'
- 3 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 4 Susanna Reid takes on Priti Patel over government's gaslighting of public on coronavirus
- 5 Bob Geldof takes swipe at No 10 saying 'lying is second nature' to them
- 6 Tory MP complains 'less scrutiny of trade deals' than when UK was in EU
- 7 The greatest failure of government in our lifetime
- 8 Comedian wins praise after shaming No 10 during Dancing on Ice appearance
- 9 No 10 says Biden removing Churchill bust ‘up to president’ despite Obama attack
- 10 Who's on the BBC's Question Time tonight?
He warned her that the common rulebook proposal could make "trade deals almost impossible" if it meant regulations would have to apply to any goods coming into the UK.
He said that "it is possible that this deal is worse" than a "no deal" Brexit.
"As with eggs: an egg that is very softly boiled isn't boiled at all. A very soft Brexit means that we haven't left, we are simply a rule-taker," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
"That is not something that this country voted for, it is not what the prime minister promised."
Fellow hardliner Andrea Jenkyns said she was "awaiting the detail" of the plansfrom Mrs May before deciding whether to call for a leadership contest.
She said the common rulebook would mean "British businesses will continue to be a rule-taker from the EU".
Veteran right-winger Sir Bill Cash told BBC's Newsnight he was "deeply disappointed, to say the least" and the plans "raise a lot of very serious questions".
The prime minister has told her Cabinet that collective responsibility rules are now being fully applied, meaning she will not tolerate criticism of what has been agreed.
Cabinet Brexiteers defended the plans in public, with transport secretary Chris Grayling saying: "I didn't campaign to leave the European Union to have a different specification of motor car on sale in the UK to the one that's on sale in France.
"This is simply saying that we will effectively sell the same products across Europe as we do now - it's what business does and would do anyway, nobody produces a different product for one country."
Asked what the common rulebook with the EU on food products would mean for the proposed US trade deal, Mr Grayling told Today: "There may be individual issues to address in future trade talks."
He stressed that the European Court of Justice's "remit in the UK will end when we leave" but "of course there will be a degree of looking from one group of judges to another".
Commons leader Andrea Leadsom said: "As a passionate Brexiteer with huge optimism about future as a free trading nation, I agree with the PM that keeping the UK together is vital."
Business secretary Greg Clark, one of the Cabinet ministers favouring close alignment to limit economic damage, welcomed the "very positive" outcome.
Pro-EU Tory Anna Soubry said she would "always welcome" a policy that delivers a "business friendly Brexit", adding that she had "no doubt" the prime minister would now enforce Cabinet discipline.
Under the government's plans the UK would be free to diverge from EU rules over services, a major part of the British economy, with ministers acknowledging this will reduce the levels of access available to European markets.
Free movement would also end, although the proposals include a "mobility framework" to ensure UK and EU citizens can easily travel to each other's territories and apply to study or work.
Brussels will be reluctant to support any plan which would risk splitting the single market, and ministers appeared to acknowledge this by agreeing to step up preparations for a "no deal" Brexit.
But Mrs May said she hoped the proposals, which will be produced in a formal white paper next week, would enable talks with the EU to move forward.
The EU's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier said he was looking forward to the publication of the white paper and the EU would consider whether the proposals are "workable and realistic".
Business leaders, who have raised concerns about the impact of Brexit on jobs and the economy, also welcomed the Cabinet agreement.
CBI director-general Carolyn Fairbairn said it was a "genuine confidence boost" but added: "The hard work starts now, and time is a challenge."
Shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer said: "It is farcical that it has taken two years for the Cabinet to even attempt to agree a position on the basics of our future relationship with the EU.
"On previous form, whatever has apparently been agreed will struggle to survive contact with Tory MPs and members."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.