Rees-Mogg accuses opposition MPs of trying to ‘stymie’ government by refusing Commons return
Leader of the House of Commons, Jacob Rees-Mogg, arrives for a cabinet meeting in Downing Street. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA. - Credit: PA Wire/PA Images
Jacob Rees-Mogg has accused opposition MPs of trying to 'stymie' the government by refusing to return to the House of Commons.
Ahead of a meeting with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle, senior politicians from opposition parties and representatives of the unions, Rees-Mogg claimed that parliament was not able to do its job properly under the current arrangements.
Speaking on his ConservativeHome podcast, Rees-Mogg said: 'What has been done is remarkable but it simply isn't a proper parliament doing its job.'
He said the hybrid provisions, which have included MPs contributing over video-link from their homes and taking part in remote voting, limited the amount of scrutiny of legislation.
He added: 'Frankly, the opposition like having a hybrid parliament because what is the opposition there to do? It's there to stop the Government getting things done.
You may also want to watch:
'And it was willing to sacrifice a degree of scrutiny to stymie the government's programme.'
He said it would be 'unreasonable' for pupils to start returning to schools in England - which could happen from June 1 in a phased manner - while MPs stayed away from parliament.
Rees-Mogg dismissed reports that the Tories were keen for a physical parliament to return in order to bolster Boris Johnson when he takes on Sir Keir Starmer, following difficult sessions of Prime Minister's Questions against the new Labour leader.
Most Read
- 1 Leave EU website suspended after EU registry blocks move to Ireland
- 2 The greatest failure of government in our lifetime
- 3 Comedian wins praise after shaming No 10 during Dancing on Ice appearance
- 4 Television drama to focus on Boris Johnson's first year in Downing Street
- 5 Boris Johnson claims Labour supporters using Universal Credit vote to incite hatred
- 6 The bigot we should have called out on day one
- 7 The polling that signals the plight of the Union
- 8 Progressive alliance could see Labour win 351 seats at next election, new analysis reveals
- 9 Dominic Raab 'not convinced' collapse of fishing businesses would be result of Brexit deal
- 10 Michael Gove among 14 Tory MPs revealed to have joined banned Parler app
It was a 'completely trivial' point and claimed that Sir Keir's 'Perry Mason approach to parliamentary scrutiny' did not work.
'It may convince a jury in a TV series but it didn't convince the British public,' he said.
Rees-Mogg is due to take part in a meeting of the House of Commons Commission chaired by the speaker on Tuesday.
Critics of Jacob Rees-Mogg's approach have warned that returning to Westminster would put staff and MPs at risk of spreading coronavirus and fly in the face of the advice to work from home wherever possible.
The government does not want to see the so-called 'hybrid' arrangements - allowing MPs to participate remotely - extended beyond the Whitsun recess, which ends on June 2.
That would mean MPs would have to attend in person to take part in proceedings at Westminster.
Prospect, the union which represents staff in the Houses of Parliament, said a risk assessment had not been carried out for the return of all MPs and warned that Commons votes could take an hour to resolve because of social distancing rules limiting the numbers allowed in the lobbies.
The union's deputy general Garry Graham said: 'Staff have made Herculean efforts to enable Parliament to work remotely, keeping MPs and staff safe and ensuring our democracy is unimpaired.
'It beggars belief that the government would throw all of this away by forcing hundreds of MPs and staff to return to Westminster, putting them at risk and causing vast delays that will hamstring Parliament's ability to function effectively.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.