Ignore the Lib Dems at your own peril
- Credit: Archant
With the Tory leadership contest dominating news headlines, the Lib Dem contest has been ignored. PETER TYZACK says ignore the anti-Brexit party at your own peril.
One thing that escapes me is the lack of any real coverage, apart from within this publication, of the other ongoing leadership contest. With the latest election results supposedly dictating the balance of news coverage, the Liberal Democrats should surely be riding high.
Ignore them at your peril, because every inane spluttering of the Brexit gang is actually building up the membership and voter support of the Lib Dems, and a victory for Boris could lead to one of the shortest governments of all time, followed by an election win for the Lib Dems.
Peter Tyzack, Severn Beach
You may also want to watch:
Thanks to Tim Walker for the interviews with the two Lib Dem leadership candidates.
Unfortunately neither addressed one of the most controversial policies of the coalition government, namely Andrew Lansley's NHS bill, a top-down, privatising 'reform' which the Tory manifesto had ruled out.
- 1 Boris Johnson’s latest offence shouldn’t be overlooked
- 2 Our PM demonstrates why Latin lessons plan is a bad idea
- 3 The cannabis conundrum
- 4 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 5 Can King Louis turn back the clock?
- 6 Empty shelves are partly down to Brexit - but Leavers won't admit it
- 7 Party politics will not save us from the Tories - we need drastic action
- 8 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
- 9 Cost of Brexit is already 38 times more than the money set aside for levelling up
- 10 Why Germany's Greens failed to rise on floods
I had an extended correspondence with my otherwise excellent Lib Dem MP, arguing against the bill. Unfortunately he insisted on supporting it. He lost his seat in the next election. Vince Cable privatising the Royal Mail did not help.
The privatisation question must be addressed by the Lib Dems, the Greens and the Independent Group for Change without ambiguity.
Geoff Byrne, Bristol
In the middle of the battle of Waterloo, Napoleon took a nap. When he awoke and came back to the battle, the day was lost. And great was the carnage.
In a similar scenario, parliament, in the midst of the gravest crisis this country has faced probably since the Second World War, is facing the prospect of leaving the European Union without a deal. The coming three weeks will be lost while the Tory party wrangles over who should be their leader.
Then at the end of July, parliament will close down for a six-week nap, before spending another three weeks in conferences. Leaving it only four weeks to try to undo the knot that the Tories have tied our country in.
Is this a deliberate filibuster to run the clock down, or a crass disregard for the people by whom they have been elected? To me it feels like both.
Damian Duggan, Gainsborough
- What do you think? Get your thoughts featured on our letters pages by emailing email@example.com
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.