Downing Street unhappy about Labour’s plan to give John Bercow a peerage
- Credit: Getty Images
Downing Street are reportedly unhappy with the news Labour could nominate John Bercow for a peerage after the Tories failed to put him forward over the New Year period.
Labour has not denied reports that ex-speaker Bercow is among the list of nominees for peerages drawn up by Corbyn.
But Downing Street stressed that the "long-standing convention" was that the leader of the opposition would only nominate people representing their own party for a place in the Lords.
Bercow was elected as Tory MP for Buckingham before becoming the speaker in 2009.
Downing Street would not comment on specific nominations and it is understood that no list of potential peers from Corbyn has been submitted to the prime minister.
You may also want to watch:
But the prime minister's official spokesman said: "It is a long-standing convention that leaders of the opposition can nominate individuals representing their party for peerages."
They themselves, however, appear to have broken convention by making the speaker the first in 230 years not to automatically enter the House of Lords.
- 1 Boris Johnson warned majority will be 'wiped out' over treatment towards north of England
- 2 Boris Johnson 'frantically repositioning' himself for Donald Trump to lose election
- 3 Danny Dyer praised for criticisms of Tory party - pointing out Etonians can't run the country
- 4 Third Tory MP who rejected extending free school meals is targeted with local protests
- 5 UKIP set to select 'Dr Gammons' as candidate for London mayoral election
- 6 Piers Morgan calls Boris Johnson a 'blustering buffoon' in attack on PM's handling of Covid-19 pandemic
- 7 Boris Johnson 'hid in bedroom' to avoid grilling on Brexit stance days before becoming PM
- 8 Government hands private companies £180m to carry out Brexit contracts
- 9 Tory MP blames 'chaotic parents' for children going to school hungry
- 10 Tory MP says policies no longer match 'principles on which millions have backed us'
Bercow is not the only controversial choice on Corbyn's list of nominations, which was reported by the Sunday Times.
His former chief of staff Karie Murphy has also been put forward for an honour despite the current inquiry into alleged instances of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).
The Jewish Labour Movement said Murphy's nomination was "deeply inappropriate and must be rescinded immediately".
"Jeremy Corbyn is using his final weeks in office to reward failure," the group added.
Campaign group Hope Not Hate called for the decision to be delayed until the report is released.
Writing to the House of Lords Appointments Commission they said: "A submission by the Jewish Labour Movement to the EHRC included allegations that complaint processes lacked independence from the leader's office, that staff in the leader's office denied antisemitism was an issue and that individuals, including Karie Murphy, appointed staff members with a known history of antisemitism. Additionally, separate allegations have been raised by whistleblowing staff members including that Ms. Murphy spied on staff and demanded details of their computer searches.
"An informed decision as to the ennoblement of Ms. Murphy is not possible until such time that the EHRC has fully considered all allegations against her and come to a determination as to her culpability with regard to the issue of antisemitism within the Labour Party."
It was a view echoed by Labour deputy leadership hopeful Rosena Allin-Khan, who said: "Hope Not Hate said that anyone who was being investigated by the EHRC shouldn't be recommended for a peerage, so I do think that does need to be taken seriously."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.