Judge rejects appeal for judicial review into BBC’s ‘Remain bias’
- Credit: PA
A judge has dismissed an appeal surrounding a former BBC employee's crowdfunded case that called for a judical review into the corporation over alleged Remain bias.
David Keighley, who was once a publicity officer for the corporation and now runs website News-Watch, claims that there is "systemic bias" in the BBC's reporting of EU news and claims that is has been "vigorously pushing the case for Remain".
The Press Gazette reports that he raised almost £60,000 from more than 1,4000 people last year to bring a judicial review over the BBC's "apparent failure" in impartiality on Brexit.
His case focused on reviewing the system that the BBC uses to monitor impartiality, arguing current practices were not adequate.
Thomas Roe QC, representing Keighley, said last year that the charter "requires the BBC to devise and implement a system for measuring the extent to which its news and current affairs output ensures the fair ventilation of all lawful views on matters of political controversy, and for reflecting on what these measurements show".
You may also want to watch:
Roe said that the BBC "makes no attempt to subject its output to measurement against the criterion of impartiality", and that audience surveys were not sufficient.
The case was dismissed by the Court of Appeal, with Lord Justice Singh claiming there were no prospect of success.
- 1 Labour leader defends NHS after being kicked out of pub in Bath
- 2 Opposition parties push for probe into Boris Johnson's conduct following viral video
- 3 ‘I should not have listened to Cameron’ – Former European Commission president
- 4 A chapter is over for Britain, for good or ill
- 5 Brexit regret: Meet the Leave voters who wish they hadn't voted Leave
- 6 The biggest scandal may be that no rules were broken
- 7 Scottish Tory leader accused of 'nonsense' excuse for Boris Johnson avoiding Scotland
- 8 Russell Kane: Why working class people like Boris Johnson
- 9 Welsh government refused permission for legal challenge over post-Brexit bill
- 10 The deep-seated issues beneath Sofagate
"The BBC is under no obligation to adopt a certain methodology, this is a matter left to their judgment," he said.
"Furthermore, there is no basis for the argument that the use of audience surveys is an irrational measure to adopt."
The court heard how Ofcom had ruled in favour of the BBC over impartiality rules in regards to its news and current affairs coverage of Brexit on a number of occasions.
Writing on the "help us stop the BBC bias" crowdfunder, Keighley said he has to pay £18,000 to the BBC to cover its legal costs, but he planned to keep fighting the corporation.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.