Official Labour report blames second Brexit referendum - not leadership - for election defeat
- Credit: PA
An official report into Labour's election defeat blames a second Brexit referendum rather than Jeremy Corbyn.
The post-mortem examination circulated to the party's ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) found it would be "unrealistic" not to say its policy to hold a fresh referendum played a "decisive" role.
Radicalism was largely ruled out as being at fault in the report by election co-ordinators Andrew Gwynne and Ian Lavery, but they did blame a glut of policies for confusing the public.
While the MPs accepted there were "negative views" of the outgoing leader, there was little blame laid at any of his actions.
Labour entered the election with a stance of holding another EU referendum on the options of Remain and a "credible" departure deal.
You may also want to watch:
The official report contrasted this policy with the "endlessly-repeated clarity" of the Tories' "misleading promise to 'get Brexit done"'.
The "prolonged uncertainty" of Labour's position took its toll on support as did its failures in advancing positive proposals for resolving Brexit in parliament, the report said.
- 1 Tory MP blames 'chaotic parents' for children going to school hungry
- 2 Boris Johnson 'hid in bedroom' to avoid grilling on Brexit stance days before becoming PM
- 3 Tory MP says policies no longer match 'principles on which millions have backed us'
- 4 George Osborne says it is 'game over' for Boris Johnson over free school meals
- 5 UKIP set to select 'Dr Gammons' as candidate for London mayoral election
- 6 Andy Burnham could have been 'halfway through tenure as PM by now', claims commentator
- 7 Danny Dyer praised for criticisms of Tory party - pointing out Etonians can't run the country
- 8 Liz Truss to deliver speech rejecting 'Britain First' strategy ahead of US election
- 9 Minister sparks concerns about pig semen after Brexit
- 10 Brexit shambles: A stress of our own making
This allowed Labour to be "unfairly painted" as part of an "obstructive establishment thwarting the people's will", it continued.
Key seat targeting in the campaign was also blamed in the report, which shielded the role of the party's radical manifesto saying its 2017 pledges secured a massive vote increase despite being attacked with "comparable venom".
"It is unlikely that radicalism was in itself the problem in a country looking for change," the document said, but pointed towards the scale of pledges seeming "implausible" to many voters.
The report concluded that "too many policies... were launched on an almost daily basis" which "confused the public as to our sense of priorities and disorientated activists".
It accepted there were growing "negative views" of the leader which were "strongly affected by the Brexit crisis".
"There is also little doubt that four years of unrelenting attacks on the character of the party leader, an assault without precedent in modern politics, had a degree of negative impact," the report said.
The report was interpreted by some as having absolved Corbyn, a position that was rejected by leadership hopeful Lisa Nandy.
"I haven't seen the report but I think none of us can be exonerated for the worst election defeat since 1935," the Wigan MP told LBC.
She said the Brexit position was a factor, which she accused the leadership of having hit the "sweet spot" where both sides of the divide thought the party was against them.
She also said she was now in a "lovely place" having taken Twitter off her phone in an attempt to connect with the voters and not the "Westminster bubble".
The focus on the social media "hothouse" has been a major problem for the left, Nandy argued, leading to misguided beliefs over when it is failing or succeeding.
"We should be out there amongst the public if we really want to understand what's happening," she said.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.