Gove mocked for Dickensian proposal to allow Brits to sift through rubbish
- Credit: Archant
Brexiteer Michael Gove's latest idea to allow us to sift through rubbish tips has been mocked as another example of just how bad things could get after Brexit.
The environment minister has proposed that councils across the country open up waste sites so that we can look for hidden treasure.
Gove's plan would allow people to search landfill sites and take home reject applicances, old televisions, and half-used paint cans.
The initiative, said to have come from a Charles Dickens novel, has been mocked by many on social media as another sign of just how desperate things could get after Brexit.
The suggestion is quite a contrast to when Michael Gove claimed two years ago that we can 'show the rest of Europe the way to flourish' if we vote for Brexit.
The minister might have also got the inspiration from this article which looked back at the time Gove sifted through David Attenborough's rubbish for Channel 4.
You may also want to watch:
- 1 A lesson from the last of Mainwaring's men
- 2 Scathing report accuses Boris Johnson of 'only caring for England'
- 3 Nick Clegg says EU 'let itself and millions of Europeans' down over Covid vaccine programme
- 4 The stench of scandal seeping out from Britain
- 5 European Council president faces call to resign over 'Sofagate' incident
- 6 How the vaccines have shifted opinions over Brexit
- 7 No 10 rewrote race disparity report, expert claims
- 8 Exports to EU increase in February after record fall
- 9 Sturgeon attacks Westminster decision to refer Holyrood Bills to Supreme Court
- 10 Former chief scientist accuses Boris Johnson of privatising NHS 'by stealth'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.