UK ministers must scrap controversial Brexit power clause - Scottish Brexit minister
The UK government must withdraw a contentious part of key Brexit legislation after the Scottish Parliament refused to grant consent, Scotland's Brexit minister has said.
Michael Russell said if UK ministers failed to remove the clause, regarding the issue of Scottish Parliament consent over devolved powers returning to the UK following Brexit, against the wishes of Holyrood they were entering "very dangerous times".
He has written to Theresa May's de facto deputy, Cabinet Office minister David Lidington, accusing him of "reluctance" to meet Scottish Parliament representatives after the majority of MSPs voted last month not to grant a legislative consent motion (LCM) for the EU Withdrawal Bill.
Speaking at Holyrood's Rural Environment and Connectivity Committee, Mr Russell said: "The constitutional position is very clear.
"If the Scottish Parliament resolves not to grant an LCM which has been requested, then the UK Government must withdraw the part of the Bill for which it has requested it.
You may also want to watch:
"I would expect and hope that the UK government will now withdraw clause 11 from the bill as they are required to by the constitutional settlement under which we live.
"If they refuse to do so, then we are going into very difficult and very dangerous times."
- 1 These are the 322 Tory MPs who voted against extending free school meals to children
- 2 Priti Patel set to hand private firms £28 million in government contracts to deport asylum seekers from UK
- 3 Betty Boothroyd delivers scathing assessment of Boris Johnson's government
- 4 Boris Johnson 'plans to resign' in six months because he can't live on £150k salary
- 5 Michael Gove's Brexit fantasy is leading us down a perilous path
- 6 Question Time: Ex-Tory minister accused of making 'sickening' comment about free schools meals row
- 7 The harsh truths learned from halt in Brexit talks
- 8 Priti Patel bullying inquiry may never be released, hints Boris Johnson's new civil service boss
- 9 At the upcoming US election, Donald Trump really is toast
- 10 German MEP tells Boris Johnson he 'owes' Britons a Brexit deal as she urged a return to EU trade talks
His letter states: "The UK government must now explain how - not if - it proposes to reflect the views of the Scottish Parliament.
"If no alternative approach is proposed by the UK government to respond to the Scottish Parliament's views, the correct constitutional position is for the UK government to remove clause 15 (formerly 11) as it relates to Scotland from the nill."
It continues: "A failure on the UK government's part to act in line with the refusal of the Scottish Parliament to consent to the bill would wilfully undermine the devolution settlement and the confidence of the Scottish Parliament in the UK government's respect for devolution."
Mr Russell said in the letter he was "disappointed" Mr Lidington had not accepted the invitiation to meet MSPs in Scotland and would consult the other parties over his "reluctance to meet with them".
He also told MSPs Scottish ministers had been invited to contribute to the draft Brexit white paper at the Brexit ministerial forum last month, by being shown a content list and asked if they had views on any of the items.
He said they had since found out through press reports a white paper had been produced but neither the cabinet or members of the Scottish Government are able to view it.
He told the committee: "We'll go ahead in good faith and we will give the views on the items that we have in terms of the content list but whether it will make any difference, or we might as well put the piece of paper in a bottle and throw it in the sea, I don't know."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.