Russia report says government has not investigated interference in Brexit referendum
- Credit: Archant
The government has been accused of not doing enough to investigate Russian interference in the Brexit referendum, the Russia report has found.
The report - issued on Tuesday following a nine-month wait - criticised the intelligence community and government for not dedicating enough resources to investigating Russian involvement in the 2016 referendum on EU membership.
The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) noted there was 'preponderance of pro-Brexit or anti-EU stories' on Russia Today and Sputnik at the time of the vote, whilst there was also 'the use of 'bots' and 'trolls'' on Twitter.
You may also want to watch:
But when the parliamentary panel in charge of the investigation asked Britain's domestic spy agency, MI5, for evidence on Russian meddling in the vote, they only received just six lines of text at first.
- 1 Nigel Farage loses nearly 50,000 followers after Twitter suspends QAnon accounts
- 2 Progressive alliance could see Labour win 351 seats at next election, new analysis reveals
- 3 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 4 What Auf Wiedersehen, Pet teaches us about Britain and Europe
- 5 Fifteen ways to fix Britain
- 6 Michel Barnier tells UK to be 'very careful' in Brexit diplomatic status row
- 7 Holyrood in talks with EU to extend Erasmus scheme to Scottish students
- 8 An actor whose politics were a touchy subject
- 9 The rocky road to Rejoin
- 10 ‘Don’t haste ye back’ - Nicola Sturgeon's perfect farewell message to Donald Trump
The report read: 'We have not been provided with any post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts at interference.
'This situation is in stark contrast to the US handling of allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, where an intelligence community assessment was produced within two months of the vote, with an unclassified summary being made public.
'Whilst the issues at stake in the EU referendum campaign are less clear-cut, it is nonetheless the Committee's view that the UK intelligence community should produce an analogous assessment of potential Russian interference in the EU referendum and that an unclassified summary of it be published.'
It added: 'Even if the conclusion of any such assessment were that there was minimal interference, this would nonetheless represent a helpful reassurance to the public that the UK's democratic processes had remained relatively safe.'
The ISC said it would be 'difficult - if not impossible - to prove' allegations Russia sought to influence the 2016 Brexit referendum but 'the government was slow to recognise the existence of the threat', particularly after finding evidence of meddling during the 2014 Scottish independence referendum.
Speaking about the probe into alleged Russian interference in British democracy, Hosie said that no-one in government knew if Russia interfered or sought to influence the 2016 referendum 'because they did not want to know'.
He told reporters: 'There has been no assessment of Russian interference in the EU referendum and this goes back to nobody wanting to touch the issue with a 10-foot pole.
'This is in stark contrast to the US response to reported interference in the 2016 presidential election.
'There should have been an assessment of Russian interference in the EU referendum and there must now be one, and the public must be told the results of that assessment.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.