Home office tells 101-year-old man his parents must confirm identity to stay in UK after Brexit
- Credit: Archant
A 101-year-old Italian man who has lived in the UK since 1966 has been told that his parents must confirm his identity if he wishes to stay in the country beyond Brexit.
In what is being blamed on a computer error, Giovanni Palmiero was asked to send verification from his mother and father to complete the application for Settled Status while visiting an advice centre in Islington in north London.
According to a volunteer from the group the3million the scanner linked to the mobile app mistook Palmiero's date of birth on his passport as 2019 rather than 1919 - meaning it was assumed he was just one year's old.
It consequently triggered another step for Palmiero to take.
Dimitri Scarlato, who was helping the Italian, told the Guardian it took two calls and half an hour to make Home Office officials aware that it was a problem with the app rather than user error.
You may also want to watch:
"I immediately noticed that something was wrong because when I scanned in his passport, it imported his biometric data not as 1919 but as 2019. It then skipped the face recognition section which is what it does with under-12s," he explained.
"I was surprised. I phoned the Home Office and it took two calls and a half an hour for them to understand it was the app's fault not mine".
- 1 Betty Boothroyd delivers scathing assessment of Boris Johnson's government
- 2 Boris Johnson 'plans to resign' in six months because he can't live on £150k salary
- 3 Government told to publish impact assessments for Boris Johnson's 'Narnia' deal with EU
- 4 Brexiteer admits 'Australia-style deal' term designed to 'pull wool over voters' eyes'
- 5 Remainers blamed for Boris Johnson's inability to secure Brexit deal
- 6 Theresa May brands Michael Gove's no-deal Brexit statement 'utter rubbish'
- 7 ERG MP says Boris Johnson should consider cutting ties with Church of England following Brexit row
- 8 Boris Johnson told to apologise for incompetence in delivering his 'oven-ready' Brexit deal
- 9 Labour MP calls Dan Wootton a 'complete and utter nutcase' following Covid-19 herd immunity comment
- 10 Leaked government dossier warns of army street patrols if second Covid-19 wave and no-deal Brexit hit UK at same time
After the Home Office accepted the mistake he was then asked to provide proof of residence for five years in the country - even though he has been there since 1955 and the system is supposed to be able to find out this information through the tax residency system.
His son Assuntino told the newspaper: "It is more of a hassle than anything else. He is not going to be chucked out, but people of his age should not have to go through this process. They should just get it automatically. They should have a system for people who were here before 1973 and just post the documents out.
"They say you have to prove you have been here that long, but come on, they have HMRC records, council tax records. My parents are being sent their pensions, so how come they can't find him on the system? If they wanted to check, they could easily." "It's like a humiliation, you've been here so long and then all of a sudden this happens. I am not worried about him because he has got us but it's completely unfair on old people."
A Home Office spokesperson said: "When Mr Palmiero's case was raised our dedicated EU Settlement Scheme team contacted him and those supporting him to assist with his application.
"Over 2.7 million people have now been granted status and there is a wide range of support in place online, in person or over the phone."
The Home Office have said that other applicants who are over 100 have successfully used the app.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.