Priti Patel dodges question on remarks about coronavirus border controls
- Credit: PA
Priti Patel dodged a question on UK taking a belated border of its borders in response to coronavirus.
Speaking at the latest Downing Street press conference, the home secretary was asked by BBC journalist Vicki Young whether she felt "pleased" that Boris Johnson "has finally come round to your way of thinking" in respect of tougher border controls.
Footage emerged in recent days of Patel saying she advocated for border closure back in March, some nine months before the prime minister took the decision.
Johnson has since been accused of overruling his home secretary, with the question designed to gauge her views on the subject.
Rather than elaborating on whether she felt vindicated in light of the border restrictions now in place in the UK, Patel focused on the "stringent measures" that do exist.
You may also want to watch:
Citing the need for a negative test, the imposition of quarantine and passenger location forms as success stories, Patel did not make reference to the once-divided viewpoints of herself and her party leader.
- 1 Why Bristol is the street art city
- 2 Telling the truth is now the only sackable offence
- 3 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 4 Cost of Brexit is already 38 times more than the money set aside for levelling up
- 5 What I learned by avoiding England and the Euros
- 6 How long can Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi play on?
- 7 Could southern discomfort sink a rebalancing agenda still in its infancy?
- 8 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
- 9 Why Brexit still feels like a personal loss
- 10 Priti Patel - the poster girl for our poisonous politics
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.