Calls for government to do more to protect vulnerable in society from coronavirus impact
- Credit: Archant
The government is facing calls to do more to support the poorest in society over the coronavirus outbreak amid allegations the chancellor's £350 billion package did 'nothing' to protect home renters and those on low incomes.
Rishi Sunak has vowed to do 'whatever it takes' to buoy the economy when he set out his 'unprecedented' fiscal measures on Tuesday, as the number of people thought to have Covid-19 in the UK rose to 55,000 and the official death toll climbed to 71.
However his plan designed to protect businesses ran into criticism after it failed to acknowledge financial means of supporting those in rental accommodation and people on low incomes amid concerns over potential job losses.
Sunak was challenged on whether statutory sick pay of £94.25 a week was sufficient to support workers forced to self-isolate by the virus.
Labour's Jess Phillips demanded: 'A simple question. Has he lived on that and could he live on that, as that's what most of my constituents are currently having to live on?'
You may also want to watch:
Sunak sidestepped the question and focused on the government's response to helping those in need.
The chancellor was also urged to introduce a 'coronavirus universal basic income' which would protect self-employed tradesmen and those on zero-hours contracts.
- 1 The Prime Minister is out of his league
- 2 The cannabis conundrum
- 3 Empty shelves are partly down to Brexit - but Leavers won't admit it
- 4 Why Germany's Greens failed to rise on floods
- 5 Party politics will not save us from the Tories - we need drastic action
- 6 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
- 7 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 8 Would Javid have renamed ICU wards 'Drama Queen Zones'?
- 9 Priti Patel - the poster girl for our poisonous politics
- 10 Cost of Brexit is already 38 times more than the money set aside for levelling up
Shadow chancellor John McDonnell said the government must take urgent action to protect workers and renters.
He said: 'Our work today will focus on getting the government to bring forward an effective package of measures to protect wages for workers laid off, the sick and self-isolating, self-employed and renters.
'We will try to convince the government not to delay and to give people the security they need now.'
Boris Johnson will face further questions on the government's handling of the crisis when he takes Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday.
He told MPs: 'We've already taken steps to strengthen the safety net for the workers ... we're of course looking to do more in the employment support field.'
Business Secretary Alok Sharma insisted ministers were already working on plans to support people in employment and to help renters, with new measures to be announced 'shortly'.
'Of course people want us to go further,' he told the BBC's Breakfast programme.
'The chancellor set out very clearly that we will be coming forward when it comes to employment measures. We will come forward with that as quickly as possible.
'I know this is a very anxious time for lots of people. They are concerned about their livelihoods. That is why we have moved so quickly to provide this £350 billion package of support.
'We will continue to provide support where it is needed. The prime minister has been clear that we will do whatever it takes to protect people's health, to protect people's livelihoods.
'We had a significant intervention yesterday. We are ready to do more.'
Measures unveiled by Sunak included government-backed loans worth £330 billion - equivalent to 15% of GDP - to help businesses which need access to cash, and a package of tax cuts and grants worth more than £20 billion.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.