Ruth Davidson backs calls for Johnson burka apology
Ruth Davidson has backed calls for Boris Johnson to apologise over his "gratuitously offensive" comments on the burka.
The Scottish Conservative leader said she believed the former foreign secretary should say sorry for comparing women wearing face-covering veils to bank robbers and letter boxes.
Ms Davidson is the latest senior Tory to condemn Mr Johnson for the remarks after prime minister Theresa May also urged him to apologise.
She was speaking during an "in conversation" event with former Liberal leader Lord Steel at the Fringe by the Sea in North Berwick, East Lothian, and described the comments as "poor form".
Ms Davidson said that while she agreed with the sentiment of the newspaper article in which Mr Johnson made the comments - that face-covering veils should not be banned - his remarks were offensive.
You may also want to watch:
"I think it's also not been shown through history that when men make sweeping statements about what women should or shouldn't wear that it goes well for them," she said.
"I think that this wasn't an off-the-cuff slip, he wrote a column, he knew exactly what he was doing and I think it crossed from being provocative and starting a debate and actually it became rude and gratuitous."
- 1 The stench of scandal seeping out from Britain
- 2 How the vaccines have shifted opinions over Brexit
- 3 Cross-party group set up to assess impact of UK’s post-Brexit trade deals
- 4 Why the EU is no longer the elephant in the room in the Netherlands
- 5 Why is devout Jacob Rees-Mogg so quiet about Boris Johnson's affairs?
- 6 Major and Blair were right about Brexit and Northern Ireland
- 7 David Cameron accepts ‘lessons to be learnt’ following lobbying row
- 8 No 10 rewrote race disparity report, expert claims
- 9 Roman Kemp: Depression and coping with George Michael's death
- 10 Could Putin invade the Baltics next?
She added of his comments: "I think he should apologise for them.
"It doesn't bode well, and we've seen it in the arguments and the debate over anti-Semitism in Labour, of how we've got to a point in 2018 where we're supposed to be so much better at accepting and discussing and being open about different faiths, religions, backgrounds, social classes, all of these things, and actually we've become slightly even more siloed and treating them differently.
"If you use the analogy of Christianity, would you ever write in the Telegraph that you should have a debate about banning Christians from wearing crucifixes?
"It's the same argument but it's in a different faith so why are the parameters different for one faith and not the other?
"That's where I think you start getting these questions of what constitutes anti-Semitism, what constitutes Islamophobia, and if you have that comparator in your mind then that perhaps is a better guidance for not what you should or shouldn't say, but how you frame the debate.
"I agree with the point of his piece which was you shouldn't ban the burka, the niqab, the hijab - I don't think we should ban it - but what he said was a gratuitously offensive way of saying it."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.