SAGE scientists considered explaining ‘herd immunity’ to public to explain why government was acting slowly
- Credit: PA
Some scientists who sit on the government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) committee discussed explaining 'herd immunity' to the public to explain why it was not imposing social distancing measures faster.
The advice - published by SAGE after calls for greater transparency - showed some of the experts wanted the government to explain the concept to the public.
The government has denied it was a policy that they were following, with ministers insisting they were instead 'following the science'.
But a paper dated March 4, considered by SAGE on March 5, said: 'SPI-B (scientific pandemic influenza group on behaviours) have divergent opinions on the impact of not applying widescale social isolation at the same time as recommending isolation to at-risk groups.
'One view is that explaining that members of the community are building some immunity will make this acceptable.
You may also want to watch:
'Another view is that recommending isolation to only one section of society risks causing discontent.'
Chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance talked about the concept of herd immunity in broadcast interviews on March 13, but the government later said achieving herd immunity was never a policy.
- 1 The stench of scandal seeping out from Britain
- 2 Why is devout Jacob Rees-Mogg so quiet about Boris Johnson's affairs?
- 3 Dominic Cummings' new venture could cause concern for No 10
- 4 Major and Blair were right about Brexit and Northern Ireland
- 5 Government deletes pro-Scottish independence blog post
- 6 The symbolism behind the reopening of pubs
- 7 Roman Kemp: Depression and coping with George Michael's death
- 8 Why are there so few BAME faces on the fronts of our newspapers?
- 9 David Cameron and Matt Hancock discussed NHS scheme over 'private drink'
- 10 PM chooses not to attend Prince Philip’s funeral because of guest limits
Asked about his comments back in March on herd immunity, Sir Patrick explained to the MPs on Health and Social Care Committee what he meant.
He said: 'I should be clear about what I was trying to say, and if I didn't say this clearly enough then I apologise.
'What I was trying to say was that, in the absence of a therapeutic, the way in which you can stop a community becoming susceptible to this is through immunity and immunity can be obtained by vaccination, or it can be obtained by people who have the infection.'
The Sunday Times reported that Boris Johnson's key adviser Dominic Cummings had supported the principles behind the strategy until a sharp u-turn in the middle of March, a claim he strenuously denies.
The release of the documents comes one day after SAGE published a list of some of the experts who have been sitting on the group.
The documents will be updated on a regular basis with the latest available evidence provided to SAGE.
Other documents reveal that government advisers were asked to stop shaking hands with people on the day that Boris Johnson boasted he shook the hands of those in hospital.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.