SNP MP: People's Vote could deal a blow for Scottish independence referendum
A leading SNP MP has cast doubt on his party's backing for a People's Vote on Brexit by warning it could pose "all sorts of risks to a future independence referendum for nothing".
Pete Wishart said the move could make it more difficult to resist calls for a similar second ballot in Scotland if nationalists were to win another independence referendum.
Nicola Sturgeon has said her party's MPs would "undoubtedly" back a public vote on the final deal for leaving the EU if given the option.
The SNP leader and first minister has also indicated she would seek a guarantee or "double lock" for such a ballot, for example requiring the support of all four UK nations before Britain could leave the EU.
SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford has also suggested a guarantee that Scotland could hold another vote on independence.
You may also want to watch:
But it is unclear if the SNP would withdraw its support for a People's Vote if its demands for special conditions were not met.
Writing in The National, Wishart said: "To say that we will sign up to a referendum without any guarantee that our Scottish national voice will be at least acknowledged is little more than an open invitation to have our national view ignored and disrespected all over again.
- 1 Boris Johnson proposes saving United Kingdom with 'Project Love' plan
- 2 The only Brexit export boom is from UK businesses rushing to Europe
- 3 Russell Kane: Why working class people like Boris Johnson
- 4 Former Brexit secretary 'privately agreed' with Gina Miller's court action over Article 50
- 5 The stench of scandal seeping out from Britain
- 6 PRINCE PHILIP: Why this Danish, Greek, German immigrant epitomised Britain
- 7 Is Volkswagen about to give Tesla a shock?
- 8 How the vaccines have shifted opinions over Brexit
- 9 Government loses bid to block financial services bill amendment in House of Lords
- 10 MEPs again refuse to ratify Brexit deal amid concerns No 10 is flouting conditions
"By enthusiastically buying into this confirmatory vote for an EU referendum, we weaken our hand in resisting Unionist calls for a second vote on a successful indyref.
"And if they were successful in using this precedent against us, unreconciled Unionists would be working non-stop from the day after the referendum to ensure that a successful outcome would be overturned.
"Every apparatus of state would be deployed and they would ensure that the worst possible "deal" would be offered to the Scottish people in the hope that their Union could be rescued."
Wishart, the longest-serving MP in the SNP's 35-strong Westminster group, said he considered it "very unlikely" a People's Vote would come to fruition.
"We could be presenting all sorts of risks to a future independence referendum for nothing," he added.
An SNP spokesman said: "We have made it clear that we would push strongly for any second EU referendum to have safeguards to ensure Scotland's voice is protected in the event of Scotland voting remain again while the UK as a whole voted to leave.
"Scotland's overwhelming vote to remain in 2016 - by far the most decisive vote of any of the UK nations - has been completely ignored, which underlines how Westminster completely fails to represent or protect Scotland's vital national interests."
Labour MP and People's Vote supporter Ian Murray said: "We are inching towards a parliamentary majority for a People's Vote, so this raises questions about how Pete Wishart and other SNP MPs will vote in the Commons."
Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Tavish Scott said: "The First Minister said SNP support for a People's Vote was "unequivocal".
"Her colleagues ought to be backing the campaign, not throwing up more roadblocks."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.