Secret memo to divert 1,000 defence workers for Brexit
- Credit: Houses of Parliament
A secret memo has revealed that up to 1,000 defence workers could be redeployed to help the UK government cope with a no-deal Brexit.
A message, sent to staff in the Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S) agency, appeals for volunteers to change roles.
The note, obtained by the BBC, said it was 'uncertain' what work would be required if the UK leaves the EU without an agreement.
But it said redeployment in these circumstances would offer a 'real development opportunity'.
A government spokesman said: 'The civil service has the flexibility to deliver government priorities and deploy resources appropriately to do this.
You may also want to watch:
'This includes departments sharing staff and working together on joint projects.'
But Stephen Gethins, the SNP's Westminster spokesman on Europe, said: 'As we edge closer to the disaster of Brexit, these latest revelations show that the chaos and uncertainty is all-consuming.
- 1 This chumocracy is costing our country
- 2 Fifteen ways to fix Britain
- 3 Nigel Farage loses nearly 50,000 followers after Twitter suspends QAnon accounts
- 4 Bob Geldof takes swipe at No 10 saying 'lying is second nature' to them
- 5 Michel Barnier tells UK to be 'very careful' in Brexit diplomatic status row
- 6 Jacob Rees-Mogg says it's 'all the EU's fault' musicians can't tour Europe
- 7 Independent SAGE adviser gives scathing assessment of Priti Patel's £800 Covid fines
- 8 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 9 Piers Morgan tells Gavin Williamson to resign for being a 'catastrophe'
- 10 Poll finds Brexit-backing Wales would vote to rejoin EU
'The government wants to divert 1,000 officials away from vital work supporting our armed forces, without the slightest clue what they're going to be doing.
'They're seeking volunteers to come forward to fill unspecified jobs, in unspecified places for an unspecified length of time.
'This is just in one branch of government, and likely to be replicated elsewhere, leaving big gaps in the capacity of the Civil Service which is still expected to get on with the day-to-day.
'The UK government's contingency planning for a no-deal is the very definition of too little, too late.
'It underpins the urgent need to rule out that eventuality, extend Article 50, for the UK government to finally start listening and get realistic options back on the table which could command support from across the political spectrum. First among those should be another EU referendum.'
DE&S is an arms-length body of the Ministry of Defence which manages projects to buy and support the equipment and services needed by the armed forces.
The leaked memo, issued by senior manager Neville Parton, said up to 1,000 staff might be needed for redeployment to support other government departments and local authorities.
'This provides a real development opportunity to take on a fresh challenge - developing new skills and experience,' he wrote.
'It's currently uncertain what type of support might be required, for how long and where people might be required.'
The memo suggested any redeployment should not last for not more than six months and the closing date was on January 25.
Labour MP Martin Whitfield, a supporter of the nati-Brexit campaign group Best for Britain, said: 'If the government is diverting 1,000 defence workers to cope with no deal, there's clearly been a realisation in government that Brexit poses one of the greatest threats to the nation's security.
'There's a reason the majority in Parliament want to block a no-deal scenario. It's highly damaging and would leave Britons worse off in terms of jobs and safety.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.