Brexit has cast UK ‘several decades into the past’, says Nobel prize-winning scientist
- Credit: PA
A Nobel prize-winning scientist has said Brexit has cast the UK 'several decades into the past' and feared it would damage the country's standing in the scientific community.
Sir Paul Nurse, a vocal critic of Tory government's handling of the coronavirus pandemic, accused Brexiteers of trying to relive Britain's 'imperial history that no loner exists'.
Speaking with The Observer, Sir Paul, who is the current director of the Francis Crick Institute, said the UK was 'turning away' from global collaborative science.
You may also want to watch:
'There are three major science blocs in the world, which are North America, China and the far east and Europe. Britain is actually good at science and had a lot of influence in European science. And so we have lost power and influence.'
- 1 Our PM demonstrates why Latin lessons plan is a bad idea
- 2 Boris Johnson’s latest offence shouldn’t be overlooked
- 3 The cannabis conundrum
- 4 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 5 Empty shelves are partly down to Brexit - but Leavers won't admit it
- 6 Can King Louis turn back the clock?
- 7 Party politics will not save us from the Tories - we need drastic action
- 8 30 great European books for the beach
- 9 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
- 10 Why Germany's Greens failed to rise on floods
He added: 'That's a political thing. The psychological thing is that I meet scientific colleagues around the world and they just think that the UK has turned away from collaborative science by looking back on an imperial history that no longer exists.
'It's just very sentimental. And we've taken a leap several decades into the past.'
On the government's handling of the Covid-19, Sir Paul accused ministers of reducing complex situations into 'an almost meaningless sentence'.
'I'm particularly concerned about the attempt to convey communication through one-liners such as 'we're following the science,' he said. 'It's a sort of populist tendency and that reduces complex situations to an almost meaningless sentence'.
He said ministers needed to be more transparent over the way they made decisions during the pandemic.
He said: 'For example, testing for coronavirus was absolutely critical. What they decided to do was produce very big labs to do it, not thinking that this would take many months to get it to work efficiently. Whereas they could have developed it locally and contributed something immediately.
'All the testing capacity basically did nothing during the big infection phase.'
He added: 'That was very bad policy and implemented badly, but we didn't see the discussions behind those decisions.'
Sir Paul once said that the UK was constantly playing 'catch up' with the coronavirus and has previously blasted ministers' for not treating the public 'as adults' in its communications over Covid-19.
'I think we need greater openness in the decision-making. It sometimes seems somewhat shrouded in secrecy,' Sir Paul told the BBC's Today programme in August.
'And not only that, but better communication of what's happening. Treat the public as adults.'
He continued: 'I'll give one example. At the height of the infection I was at a select committee in April and a public health person I think it was – they may have been from the Department for Health and Social Care – was saying all the testing needed for the NHS was in place.
'Yet we showed at the Francis Crick, at that time, 45% of frontline healthcare were infected and they were not being tested because capacity was inadequate.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.