MP slams government for using end of free movement as an ‘answer to everything’

Stella Creasy in the House of Commons before the coronavirus pandemic. Photograph: Parliament TV.

Stella Creasy in the House of Commons before the coronavirus pandemic. Photograph: Parliament TV. - Credit: Archant

Labour MP Stella Creasy has issued an impassioned plea for the government to go back to the drawing board with their immigration bill, which will end the EU's freedom of movement after Brexit.

Speaking during the second reading of Priti Patel's immigration bill, Creasy told MPs: 'Ending freedom of movement has become the loudest answer to everything we hear on the doorstep. No jobs? End freedom of movement. No housing, no doctor's appointment, no parking? Blame freedom of movement.'

The backbencher also issued a defence of the EU's immigration system, making a dig at Brexiteer Nigel Farage, whose family has benefited from moving freely across Europe.

Have your say

Send your letters for publication to The New European by emailing and pick up an edition each Thursday for more comment and analysis. Find your nearest stockist here or subscribe to a print or digital edition for just £13. You can also join our readers' Facebook group to keep the discussion and debate going with thousands of fellow pro-Europeans.

You may also want to watch:

She said: 'It is hard to talk about this issue without being called either a racist or a bleeding heart liberal, but the truth is that EU migration has benefited our economy. EU migrants contribute £2,300 more to the public purse each year than the average adult—and that is including the cost of their children being here, too. They are also less likely to use our public services, although they work in them. We are more likely to meet an EU migrant helping us in our hospitals than standing in front of us in a queue.

Most Read

'Over the past 20 years, immigration has been on a much larger scale than we have had in the previous 200 years, but, truthfully, however many people have come, this country has never been good at making it work. With every new wave of people, the UK has always been unwelcoming and always regretted it. Indeed, it was the same with the Huguenots, the wave of refugees that brought both my family and Nigel Farage's family here. When the Windrush generation came, they were met with 'no blacks, no Irish, no dogs'.'

Turning her attention to the coronavirus pandemic, the MP pointed out we now praise those from overseas for helping with the coronavirus response.

She continued: 'Now we rightly honour their contribution to our communities. We have demonised those who have come from Europe for years. Now, as we clap for those who are saving our lives with one set of hands, this proposed legislation asks us to abandon them with another.'

'The problem here is not immigration; it is politicians talking about what we do not want, rather than what we need. This Bill is that problem written down: bringing to an end freedom of movement without providing for what comes next, because in our toxic political culture ending freedom of movement has been sold as a solution in itself. The only answer the government are offering us about what replaces it is to expose everyone to the dysfunction that is the current immigration system — the same system that gave us the hostile environment, the Windrush scandal and the legacy system.'

Creasy turned her attention the three million EU citizens living in the UK and how it puts them at risk.

'We know 3 million of our EU citizens, who are our friends, our family and our neighbours, are now struggling with the paperwork that pre-settled status entails. There are 1 million Brits in Europe who need a good deal, too. So ask yourselves if you want your children to be able to work for companies who have offices in Berlin or Rome without them being penalised because they cannot travel there, or one that gives points out so that if you fall in love with your French exchange partner you can move to Paris or they can come to you in Barnsley. The benefits that came with freedom of movement mean that when you do not have it, you will end up wanting to invent it. Such freedoms will become more important, not less, in the coming years.'

And in an impassioned plea for a better piece of legislation she used the example of how we turned our backs on Albert Einstein.

'If we are to have a better quality of legislation, we need a better quality of debate about who is coming in and why.

'Take, for example, the immigrant who came to us having failed his exams with a patchy work history and no ties to the UK. His name was Albert Einstein. Even then, in the 1930s, the UK border authorities misplaced his papers. His landing card was only found in a trawl of old paperwork in Heathrow in 2011.

'Back then, the Daily Mail urged readers to avoid him and boycott his lectures raising money for other refugees from Nazi Europe. Back then, another MP, Oliver Locker-Lampson, tried to sponsor his British citizenship and help Jews fleeing the Nazis. Back then, we said no and we lost Einstein to America.'

Creasy concluded: 'When it comes to immigration, our policies all too often meet Einstein's definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result. I will not be voting for the Bill, because it is another example of that phenomenon and my constituents —former, current and future—deserve better from us all. All the while, we as politicians continue to behave like this and debate like this. The problem is not immigrants, it is us.'

Become a Supporter

The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.

Become a Supporter
Comments powered by Disqus