Brexit minister makes Commons apology but keeps job over 'conspiracy theory' row
A Brexit minister has avoided being sacked but was forced into a Commons apology for raising allegations which suggested Treasury officials were trying to keep Britain in the customs union.
Steve Baker said he should have corrected or dismissed an account of the claim relayed to the Commons by Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg, which he initially described as "essentially correct" and "extraordinary".
He appeared in the Commons at the start of business today to correct the record and apologise, hours after prime minister Theresa May insisted she would not sack him from his ministerial role.
The storm erupted after leading Hard Brexiteer Mr Rees-Mogg asked the minister to confirm if he had heard from Charles Grant, of the Centre for European Reform think tank, that "officials in the Treasury have deliberately developed a model to show that all options other than staying in the customs union were bad and that officials intended to use this to influence policy".
Mr Grant strongly denied the claim and Mr Baker later had to backtrack when audio recordings showed his recollection was inaccurate.
You may also want to watch:
Raising a point of order, Mr Baker told the Commons: "In the context of that audio, I accept I should have corrected or dismissed the premise of my honourable friend's question.
"I have apologised to Mr Charles Grant, who is an honest and trustworthy man.
- 1 Susanna Reid takes on Priti Patel over government's gaslighting of public on coronavirus
- 2 Brexiteer musician accused of hypocrisy after demanding No 10 help bands with EU visa
- 3 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 4 PMQs: Ben Bradshaw calls out Boris Johnson over Brexit lies
- 5 ‘Don’t haste ye back’ - Nicola Sturgeon's perfect farewell message to Donald Trump
- 6 Piers Morgan calls on Priti Patel to resign over missing crime records fiasco
- 7 Tory MPs vote down Lords bid to protect NHS from post-Brexit trade deals
- 8 9 of the best tweets of Donald Trump leaving the White House
- 9 Boris Johnson narrowly avoids defeat over vote on trade deals with genocidal regimes
- 10 Trump caller hangs up on James O'Brien after failing to cite ex-president's 'truths'
"As I've put on record many times, I have the highest regard for our hard-working civil servants.
"I'm grateful for this early opportunity to correct the record and I apologise to the House."
Questioned on the row during her visit to China, Mrs May insisted that civil servants and ministers were "working together" to deliver the best possible Brexit.
Asked by Channel 5 News whether she would sack Mr Baker, the Prime Minister replied: "No. The ministerial code says that the minister should take the earliest opportunity to amend the record that he has given to Parliament and apologise to Parliament. He will do that.
"What I understand the minister did was to reflect what he thought somebody else had said at a meeting. He has now recalled that was not right, he is going to apologise, he is going to ensure that the record in Hansard is correct so that Parliament is not misled when that record is read in the future.
"That's what the ministerial code asks him to do and that is what he will be doing."
Downing Street had initially said there was no reason to question Mr Baker's version of events, before adding he had made a "genuine mistake" after the tape was released by Prospect magazine.
Mr Baker's initial claims had provoked a furious backlash from the union representing senior civil servants, which accused him of being irresponsible and "cowardly" for failing to challenge the "conspiracy theory".
The controversy comes hot on the heels of Mr Baker drawing fire earlier in the week for dismissing Whitehall forecasts as "always wrong".
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.