Suella Braverman urged to apologise for intervening in Dominic Cummings case
- Credit: PA
The attorney general must apologise after defending Boris Johnson's most senior aide's trip to Durham, the shadow home secretary has said.
Nick Thomas-Symonds called on Suella Braverman to apologise for her intervention in the case surrounding the Cummings, suggesting her actions undermined the legal independence of her office.
In a tweet on Saturday, Braverman said: 'Protecting one's family is what any good parent does. The @10DowningStreet statement clarifies the situation and it is wholly inappropriate to politicise it.'
Thomas-Symonds told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme: 'I can't comment precisely on the communication between the attorney general and Durham Police, but what I can say for certain is this - the attorney general was wrong to be out making public statements about an individual case before even the police had made a public statement, and particularly given her role as superintendent of the Crown Prosecution Service.
'She shouldn't have been commenting on an individual case in those circumstances. That is to misunderstand the role of the Attorney General - to give unvarnished advice to government without fear or favour - and at the bare minimum she should apologise for that.'
You may also want to watch:
Asked whether Cummings broke the law during his trip to Durham during lockdown, he added: 'The guidelines that were set up, he broke them, and we know that because the police have told us in that statement had he been intercepted on that journey from the property in Durham to Barnard Castle he would have been stopped, and we know the likely advice he would have been given is to return to his house.'
It comes after Labour's shadow attorney general Lord Falconer wrote to Braverman earlier this week arguing that her tweet was part of a 'politically orchestrated campaign' in support of Cummings.
- 1 US election result could spark 'end of Brexit', claims peer
- 2 STAR TURNS: Bond star haunted by school tragedy
- 3 Brexiteer says EU 'spiteful' to end fast-track lanes for Brits after Brexit
- 4 Boris Johnson appears to forget son’s age when asked during visit to Northern Ireland
- 5 Brexit shambles: A stress of our own making
- 6 Boris Johnson 'hid in bedroom' to avoid grilling on Brexit stance days before becoming PM
- 7 Boris Johnson warned majority will be 'wiped out' over treatment towards north of England
- 8 Nigel Farage places £10,000 bet on Donald Trump to win second White House term
- 9 'Assorted caviar' and 'board games' - Gifts confiscated from Boris Johnson due to anti-corruption laws
- 10 Tory MP blames 'chaotic parents' for children going to school hungry
He added that she had breached the principle that her decisions should be free from 'political considerations or influence'.
'As attorney general you have a special constitutional responsibility for the appropriate enforcement of the criminal law and are responsible for oversight of criminal prosecutions,' Lord Falconer wrote.
He added that Cummings 'unquestionably broke the law' when he travelled to Durham beauty spot Barnard Castle.
Responding to Lord Falconer's letter, Braverman said: 'There is of course no question of my having offered any public legal view (as you know, Law Officers do not publish their legal advice much less tweet about it), nor of seeking to pre-empt any formal investigation.
'The purpose of my comments, as I think would be obvious to a fair-minded observer, was simply to support the decision to clarify events. You will understand that I propose to make no further comment.'
In a second letter, she added: 'As you know, the police and Crown Prosecution Service operate independently and I have no role in their day to day decisions in individual cases.
'I fully support and have every confidence in that operational independence and, as I noted in my last letter, I have no further comment to make about this individual case.'
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.