WATCH: Slippery Arron Banks ducks Channel 4's questions
Arron Banks - under investigation over where the money for his Brexit campaign from - dodged questions about his finances when doorstepped by Channel 4 News.
The millionaire Brexiteer refused to answer journalist Fatima Manji's questions. And the man who funded posters claiming the UK was at "breaking point" over immigration even claimed that the channel's news programme was a "leading proponent" of angst in the country.
The businessman and co-founder of the Leave.EU campaign had been interviewed on the BBC's Andrew Marr show and Sky News when Manji tried to quiz him on his funding.
Asked if he would make his accounts available to Channel 4 News, he responded: 'I won't make anything available to Channel 4 News.
'Channel 4 News is the leading proponent of fake news and Remainer, you know, angst in the country."
You may also want to watch:
When the reporter asked if Banks would be interviewed on the programme, he replied: 'Look, I'd rather go and put a revolver against my temple and pull the trigger than go on Channel 4 News.'
He added: 'Channel 4 are a propaganda channel, they're not a news channel… let me make it clear, I'm not interested in Channel 4, I'm not interested in you, and I'm now going to lunch.'
This is what happened when we asked Arron Banks if he would appear on Channel 4 News to answer questions over Brexit funds and claims of misleading MPs. pic.twitter.com/zrvFDsqyDx
-- Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) November 4, 2018
- 1 Pro-Brexit fishing campaigner says Boris Johnson's deal has left her with 'no fish'
- 2 European parliament agrees to add British overseas territories to post-Brexit tax haven blacklist
- 3 Telegraph columnist blames Angela Merkel for Brexit
- 4 Minister terminates interview after suggesting public's age and weight to blame for UK's high death toll
- 5 This picture of Boris Johnson on the phone to Joe Biden has caused a stir
- 6 Boris Johnson to visit Scotland this week in attempt to shore up the union
- 7 Brexiteer calls for UK to save Eurostar - by buying it and renaming it 'Britstar'
- 8 Petition launched to cancel 'festival of Brexit' event in 2022
- 9 Brussels to launch campaign teaching younger Britons about the EU
- 10 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
One senior MP has said that the TV grilling of Banks by Marr earlier had exposed a "discrepancy" in his account of how he sourced £8m of funding to the Leave campaign.
Banks has insisted there was "no Russian money and no interference" after a criminal probe was launched into the source of the money.
He told the Andrew Marr Show that all the cash came from a UK-registered company, and repeated claims that he was being targeted by Remain-supporting politicians.
But Damian Collins, chairman of the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said Banks had previously given evidence that the company existed to provide services to his other enterprises, and generated no cash of its own.
A National Crime Agency (NCA) probe has been launched into "suspected criminal offences" after the Electoral Commission said it had reasonable grounds to suspect that Banks was not the true source of the cash.
The elections watchdog also said that loans involved a company - Rock Holdings - based on the Isle of Man, which was impermissible under finance rules.
Collins told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that Banks' TV appearance had gone "not very far" in establishing the facts.
"Basically Arron Banks said the money came from a holding company that he told the Select Committee provides services to the other companies he owns," said the Conservative MP.
"What's not clear is where the money came from to get to that holding company in the first place, because this is a business that in and of itself doesn't generate cash. The question is where did the money come from?
"It is a discrepancy because what he told us was that Rock Services really just provides services to other companies that he owns - provides cash, makes payments. It doesn't make any money itself. It's not selling products and services and generating cash.
"For Rock Services to have money to give to Leave.EU or anyone else, that money has got to have been put in that bank account by another company or another individual.
"If Rock Services made the donation, where did the money come from for Rock Services to do that? That is still not clear. No matter how many times he was asked that question, he didn't answer it."
Collins rejected suggestions that the UK's departure from the European Union should be put on hold while the investigation into Banks and Leave.EU was carried out.
Questions over the validity of the referendum result could be raised only if misconduct was "proven to be true as a consequence of the investigation", he said.
The "unprecedented" involvement of the NCA in the case was an important step because the agency was able to examine all financial records of Banks's businesses, including in areas outside UK jurisdiction such as the Isle of Man, said Mr Collins.
"I want this to be done as quickly as possible," he said. "But this isn't a question of what should be done about the referendum. Ultimately that is a matter for Parliament.
"It's important that the investigation goes ahead as quickly as possible and that Arron Banks is investigated. There's an argument he uses which is to say this is all politically motivated, this is not a proper investigation, it's about trying to delay Brexit.
"There are two issues here. There is the Brexit process which is ongoing and there is what should be a full and proper investigation into Mr Banks and the source of his funds."
The Electoral Commission's review of referendum finances focused on £2m reported to have been loaned to Better For The Country by Mr Banks and his insurance companies and a £6m donation which he made alone.
Banks and Leave.EU chief executive Liz Bilney deny any wrongdoing.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.