Financial watchdog ‘astonished’ by No 10’s failure to plan for a pandemic
- Credit: PA
Downing Street's failure to plan for the economic impact of a pandemic like the coronavirus has been called 'astonishing' in a scathing report by financial watchdogs.
The influential cross-party Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said the government underestimated and was unprepared for the economic toll a pandemic would have on Britain.
It warned that Number 10's economic response had been rushed and risked leaving whole sectors behind.
You may also want to watch:
The committee said the lack of preparedness could have a 'long-term' impact on the economy.
- 1 Tory minister admits UK rejected EU's music visa offer in order to 'take back control' of borders
- 2 Priti Patel fails to appear in Commons to answer questions on missing police records
- 3 Iain Duncan Smith defends calling Donald Trump 'a decent man'
- 4 Kwasi Kwarteng confirms post-Brexit review of workers' rights
- 5 The bigot we should have called out on day one
- 6 Leave EU website suspended after EU registry blocks move to Ireland
- 7 Bob Geldof vindicated over pro-EU fishing stunt, suggests broadcaster
- 8 Brandon Lewis unable to explain to Piers Morgan reason for UK having 'worst COVID death in the world'
- 9 Brexiteer MP criticised after suggesting No 10 should break Northern Ireland Protocol
- 10 Boris Johnson blames seafood companies for post-Brexit sales slump
It said the Treasury waited until mid-March, days before the lockdown, before deciding on the economic support schemes it would put in place.
The committee also warned of the impact on children, stating: 'It will be a huge task to ensure lengthy school closures do not have long-term or irreversible effects on children and young people's future health and education.
'Yet, while school closures were predicted in pandemic planning, there seems to have been no plan for how schools and pupils would be supported to continue to learn.'
The PAC urged the government to 'learn lessons' from its response and 'ensure it doesn't repeat its mistakes again in the event of a second spike in infections - or another novel disease outbreak'.
The report stated: 'We are astonished by the government's failure to consider in advance how it might deal with the economic impacts of a pandemic.'
Labour chairwoman of the committee, Meg Hillier, said: 'Pandemic planning is the bread and butter of government risk planning, but we learn it was treated solely as a health issue, with no planning for the economic impacts.
'This meant that the economic strategy was of necessity rushed and reactive, initially a one-size-fits-all response that's leaving people - and whole sectors of the economy - behind.
'A competent government does not run a country on the hoof, and it will not steer us through this global health and economic crisis that way.
She added: 'We need reassurance that there is serious thinking behind how to manage a second spike.
'This is not some kind of competition - this is our nation's lives and livelihoods at stake.'
The report noted that the government had undertaken a pandemic simulation exercise in 2016 known as Exercise Cygnus.
However, it stated: 'Exercise Cygnus may have been health-focused but it is astounding that the government did not think about the potential impact on the economy, and that the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy was not even aware of the exercise.
'Despite the first reported case of coronavirus being confirmed by the chief medical officer in England on 31 January 2020, the Treasury did not announce plans for significant funding to support businesses and individuals until the budget on 11 March, and it did not become clear to the Treasury until the following week that a furlough scheme would be needed.'
The report also called for more transparency in government decision-making.
It stated: 'Decision-making on important issues, such as introducing the Test and Trace programme, has been slow.
'The government's response in some areas has been poorly co-ordinated and has not adequately taken into account long-term impacts on people and communities.
'For example, the government's 'stop-start' approach to school closures risks major harm to many children's life chances, exacerbating already existing inequalities.'
The study added: 'The Cabinet Office should review crisis command structures to ensure that longer-term decision making, as well as the immediate operational response, is properly informed and coordinated effectively across government.
The PAC report was also highly critical of how the issue of personal protective equipment (PPE) was handled.
The study said: 'There were fundamental flaws in the government's central procurement and local distribution of vital goods and equipment.
'We recognise that the government was faced with a massive challenge to procure a huge quantity of personal protective equipment (PPE) for 58,000 separate sites including hospitals and care homes. But, despite a pandemic being identified as the government's top non-malicious risk, it failed to stock up in advance.
'The Department of Health and Social Care was not focused enough on the challenge of how to identify need in the care sector and ensure supply of PPE.'
The report also called for greater involvement with businesses regarding their needs.
It stated: 'The Treasury should engage with key sectors and industries, such as the aviation sector, to develop bespoke support measures aimed at helping those businesses through the ongoing effects of the pandemic.'
It added: 'Central government has not given local authorities the clarity or support they need over longer-term funding.'