Tory backbenchers plot new rebellion over 10pm curfew
- Credit: PA
Tory backbenchers are plotting a new rebellion over coronavirus restrictions - this time over the 10pm curfew for pubs and restaurants.
Rebels are reportedly looking to force a vote on the issue, the Telegraph reports, after MPs in Boris Johnson's own party accused him of presiding over a "nanny state".
Steve Baker, one of the leading voices over the last rebellion of coronavirus powers, told the newspaper: "I'm picking up plenty of dissatisfaction over the 10pm rule among colleagues.
"Many MPs simply don't understand the basis for it. Matt Hancock should look again at whether that rule is working."
Tory MP Greg Clark, the chairman of the Commons science and technology committee, has also requested that Hancock "detail the evidence and advice informing the decision" to close pubs early.
There was also opposition to the rules from those on Liberal Democrat benches.
You may also want to watch:
Deputy leader Daisy Cooper told the Commons: "The evidence is clear that the 10pm pubs curfew has been a hammer blow to hospitality, and turfing crowds of people out of Covid-secure venues onto the streets is putting lives and livelihoods at risk."
- 1 Empty shelves are partly down to Brexit - but Leavers won't admit it
- 2 The Spanish village with the mythical blue lagoon
- 3 Why Bristol is the street art city
- 4 A very nearly enchanted evening
- 5 Boris Johnson enjoys splendid isolation
- 6 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
- 7 The Tories have already lost the culture wars
- 8 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 9 Priti Patel - the poster girl for our poisonous politics
- 10 The riproaring life of the real Cyrano de Bergerac
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.