Boris Johnson says coronavirus inquiry would be a ‘waste of official time’ during Commons committee grilling
Prime minister Boris Johnson at the influential Liaison Committee. Photograph: Parliament TV.
Boris Johnson has refused to say when his government will launch a coronavirus inquiry.
The prime minister said it would “not be a good use of official time” to launch an inquiry.
Appearing in front of the all-powerful Liaison Committee, Johnson said: “Of course, we will have an inquiry into everything that has gone wrong and gone right. We will try to work out what would be better in the future, but, I have to say that would not be a good use of official time at the moment.
“We’ve just had an official discussion about the very pressing need to ramp up our testing operations and a huge number of officials around the country are involved in that right now.”
Tory MP William Wragg pressed: “Announcing an inquiry now would mean it would probably start in the new year so, what is the impediment of getting that background work underway?”
Johnson said the civil service was too busy responding to the coronavirus to deal with an inquiry.
“Is there any further thoughts in terms of lessons learnt and could you give some key examples and how they’ve been implemented?” Wragg continued.
Most Read
- 1 The biggest scandal may be that no rules were broken
- 2 A chapter is over for Britain, for good or ill
- 3 Russell Kane: Why working class people like Boris Johnson
- 4 The deep-seated issues beneath Sofagate
- 5 BBC journalist admits being 'haunted' by fear broadcaster 'built up' Nigel Farage and UKIP
- 6 What's the appeal behind Line of Duty?
- 7 Welsh government takes Westminster to court over post-Brexit bill
- 8 Alan Duncan should have spoken out sooner about Boris Johnson
- 9 The only Brexit export boom is from UK businesses rushing to Europe
- 10 PRINCE PHILIP: Why this Danish, Greek, German immigrant epitomised Britain
“I wouldn’t want to anticipate the work of any such inquiry,” Johnson said before saying that the government’s understanding of asymptomatic cases had changed.
On civil service reform, Johnson said he anticipated new reforms that would build the “speed” at which the civil service responds to urgent issues.
Wragg asked: “So, any such reform would not alter that fundamental established relationship between ministers and civil servants?”.
Johnson insisted it wouldn’t when Wragg chimed in with: “So when must a minister resign instead of their officials?”
“I think ministers should be responsible and I, a minister for the civil service, should take full responsibility for what the government does,” replied the prime minister.
“So, for a minister to resign does it require a failure of policy of a failure of its implementation?”
Johnson stammered: “I think a minister is obviously accountable for all failures the government can be blamed for.”
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.
