NI minister fails to explain legal grounds for scrapping Brexit customs checks
- Credit: Archant
The Northern Ireland secretary has failed to explain the legal grounds for scrapping Brexit customs checks in the Irish Sea.
Brandon Lewis was asked to clarify which part of the Northern Ireland Protocol would allow the UK to renege on its committment on customs checks - amid claims it could be breaching international law.
"Is it Article 16, which allows the UK to unilaterally take appropriate safeguard measures? And, if not, which other article is he citing?" Labour’s Hilary Benn asked.
Despite insisting the government was acting "lawfully", Lewis could not point to any part of the Protocol that allows it.
Lewis defended the government's move to unilaterally extend the grace period on Brexit regulations, saying Northern Ireland faced "empty shelves, potentially, in just a couple of weeks' time".
He also lashed out at Labour for “defending the EU rather than defending the actions of the UK government, which is standing up for the people of Northern Ireland".
You may also want to watch:
Lewis stressed the government was keen to get back to the negotiating table.
But the minister's words may have fallen on deaf ears after the EU hinted it would press ahead with legal action against the UK government.
Lewis' failure to state the legal basis for unilaterally delaying the checks is likely to be seized upon by Brussels as it prepares its legal action.
- 1 Why Bristol is the street art city
- 2 Telling the truth is now the only sackable offence
- 3 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 4 Cost of Brexit is already 38 times more than the money set aside for levelling up
- 5 What I learned by avoiding England and the Euros
- 6 How long can Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi play on?
- 7 Could southern discomfort sink a rebalancing agenda still in its infancy?
- 8 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
- 9 Why Brexit still feels like a personal loss
- 10 Has Covid killed off the cheesy Euro summer holiday hit?
That is likely to include a formal “infringement proceeding” that could end up at the European Court of justice, as well as triggering the dispute mechanism in the Brexit withdrawal agreement.
EU27 ambassadors are said to be in full agreement that the EU “had to act firmly” and action could begin as early this week.
Lewis blamed Brussels for inflaming “issues and tensions” by briefly threatening to invoke Article 16 itself, in the row over vaccine exports.
"The measures I announced last Wednesday are lawful and consistent with the progressive and good faith implementation of the Protocol," he said.
And he added: "They do not change our legal obligations as set out in the Protocol under any of its articles.
"These measures are of a kind well precedented in the context of trade practice internationally and are consistent with our intention to discharge our obligations under the Protocol in good faith."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.