Campaigners condemn Priti Patel’s ‘inhumane' asylum policy plans
- Credit: PA
Campaigners and charities have condemned the government’s plans to overhaul the asylum system, with some branding the plans as “inhumane”.
Particularly of concern are plans to judge asylum seekers on how they arrived in the UK and not on merit.
Migrant Voice said the proposals would condemn asylum seekers “to a life in limbo with restricted rights”.
Nazek Ramadan, director of the advocacy charity, said: “People fleeing persecution and death have the right to seek sanctuary. That is the starting point, and no policy should undermine it.
“We are dealing here with human beings: they cannot be treated like commodities.”
You may also want to watch:
Ramadan called on the government to create viable legal routes for those seeking asylum, claiming that an international resettlement scheme cited by Priti Patel only resettles “1% of those who need it and are recognised by the United Nations”.
“The other 99% are left abandoned for years in harsh conditions,” she said.
- 1 Why Bristol is the street art city
- 2 Telling the truth is now the only sackable offence
- 3 Has something shifted in sado-populist Britain?
- 4 Cost of Brexit is already 38 times more than the money set aside for levelling up
- 5 What I learned by avoiding England and the Euros
- 6 How long can Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi play on?
- 7 Could southern discomfort sink a rebalancing agenda still in its infancy?
- 8 Boris Johnson: The sado-populist prime minister
- 9 Why Brexit still feels like a personal loss
- 10 Priti Patel - the poster girl for our poisonous politics
She added that it was “unacceptable to punish those who are simply trying to reach safety and do what any one of us would do”.
Tim Naor Hilton, interim chief executive at Refugee Action, described the proposals as a “wrecking ball to the right to claim asylum in the UK”, adding: “They represent the biggest attack on the right to claim asylum that we have ever seen and will close the door to desperate people who arrive in the UK to seek safety.
“People fleeing for their lives have little choice in how they seek safety. But these reforms punish refugees simply for how they enter the country, creating an unjust two-tier system of refuge.
“The asylum system needs reform, but these are hard-hearted and cruel proposals. There is nothing ‘fair’ about them.”
Sonya Sceats, chief executive of Freedom from Torture, said: “These proposals are an insult to the torture survivors we work with, many of whom have risked their lives to eventually reach the care and safety we can offer them in the UK.
“The government suggests this will help the most vulnerable. In reality, as they know full well, it is the vulnerable who will suffer most if these dangerous plans go ahead.”
Mike Adamson, chief executive of the British Red Cross said: “We agree the asylum system needs reform, but this announcement takes the system backwards not forwards.
“We should not judge how worthy someone is of asylum by how they arrived here. The proposals effectively create an unfair two-tiered system, whereby someone’s case and the support they receive is judged on how they entered the country and not on their need for protection. This is inhumane.”
Catholic organisation the Jesuit Refugee Service branded the plans “deeply cruel, dishonest and inhumane”, with director Sarah Teather adding: “Today is a dark day in Britain’s history.
“The government knows full well that those seeking safety are forced to cross borders irregularly. An asylum system designed to penalise this is lying about its purpose.”
The Home Office said it will maintain safe and legal routes for refugees in need of protection and will continue a long-term commitment of resettling refugees “as capacity allows”.
The UK resettled almost 25,000 refugees between 2015 and 2019, with around half being children, the department said, with the government claiming this was more than any other country in Europe and the fourth highest number around the world after the US, Canada and Australia.
This figure is understood to relate to the number housed as part of a planned scheme. Other countries are believed to have accepted more spontaneous arrivals.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.