UK’s role in EU spat over ambassador’s post-Brexit status branded ‘vindictive’ in the Lords
- Credit: Parliamentlive.tv
The UK’s role in a diplomatic row with the EU over the status of the bloc’s ambassador in London has been branded “vindictive” and “offensive” in the Lords.
Foreign office minister Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon said the government continued to engage with the EU on the long-term arrangements for the EU delegation.
Lord Ahmad told peers that he did not wish to pre-empt those talks and insisted the government wanted a relationship based on “friendly cooperation” with the EU.
But the minister faced criticism of the government’s stance in the spat from both sides of the House at question time.
Labour former cabinet minister Lord Reid of Cardowan said the initial decision not to grant full status to the ambassador would be seen by the rest of the international community as “peevish and vindictive”.
You may also want to watch:
Lord Reid urged ministers to “reverse this blunder and do the honourable thing”.
Lord Ahmad said the No 10 continued to negotiate and work with the EU on the long term arrangements and wanted an “optimum outcome” which worked for both sides.
- 1 EU expects permanent NI Brexit border checks by middle of 2021
- 2 David Cameron claims EU referendum was 'thought through' and necessary
- 3 Whitehall ‘furiously trying to manage expectations down’ on Brexit memo
- 4 Leave camp turned Brexit into a religion to capture votes, study finds
- 5 Boris Johnson contemplates charity fund to bankroll Carrie Symonds' Downing Street refurb
- 6 Brexit has robbed Britain of the mechanism to deliver on climate change
- 7 Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy sentenced to prison for corruption
- 8 Boris Johnson: Liar of the land
- 9 Extra cost of post-Brexit paperwork sees NI exports routed via Republic instead
- 10 Campaign urges Brits to declare themselves 'European' on 2021 census
Tory Baroness Hooper said the decision was “gratuitously offensive” not only to Brussels and the EU states but also to Portugal as the ambassador was a Portuguese diplomat.
She asked what benefit this “unnecessary action” could bring for Britain.
Lord Ahmad said he could not pre-empt discussions with the EU but assured peers that the EU delegation would have all the privileges and immunities they needed to “function effectively”.
It emerged last week that ambassador Joao Vale de Almeida had not been given the same status as ambassadors sent by national governments.
de Almeida is the EU’s first ambassador in London after the UK’s departure from the bloc.
In the Lords, Liberal Democrat Baroness Ludford suggested the government was “squandering goodwill” and acting in a “petty” fashion.
Lord Ahmad said the government wanted the UK to be the “best ally and the best partner to the EU”.
Tory former cabinet minister Lord King of Bridgwater urged ministers to sort the issue out as quickly as possible “so we live up to intention of being the best friend and ally” of the EU.
Former diplomat Lord Jay of Ewelme said it was time to put aside “gesture politics” and focus on developing relations necessary to make a success of the G7 summit.
Labour’s Lord Liddle questioned even the need for discussions on the ambassador’s status and accused the Foreign Secretary of searching for “cheap points” that will go down well with Brexiteer backbenchers.
Lord Ahmad denied this, insisting Dominic Raab had close working partnerships and friendships across the EU.
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.