Jacob Rees-Mogg likens awarding billions in unscrutinised PPE contracts to 'calling plumber out at 2am'
- Credit: Parliamentlive.tv
Jacob Rees-Mogg has compared the awarding of billions of pounds worth of Covid-19 contracts without proper process to "calling a plumber out at 2am".
Rees-Mogg attempted to dismiss calls for a debate on a National Audit Office report into government spending on coronavirus contracts.
A report published by the independent parliamentary body found up to £10 billion worth of medical equipment contracts had been handed out to businesses without due process.
It also revealed many of these were submitted via a "high-priority" channel that saw contracts by companies with connections to the Conservative Party ten times more likely to be approved.
The report has stated that MPs were not involved in the decision-making process.
Requesting a motion debate, Richard Thomson, an SNP, asked: "The leader of the House would be aware of a report by the National Audit Office on procurement during the pandemic which, while acknowledging the exceptional circumstances which did apply, nonetheless identified many problems with the processes undertaken and also highlighted the need to maintain public trust in the process.
"Will the leader make time in early course to allow for a full debate in this chamber on that report and its contents?"
- 1 The biggest scandal may be that no rules were broken
- 2 A chapter is over for Britain, for good or ill
- 3 Russell Kane: Why working class people like Boris Johnson
- 4 The deep-seated issues beneath Sofagate
- 5 BBC journalist admits being 'haunted' by fear broadcaster 'built up' Nigel Farage and UKIP
- 6 Welsh government takes Westminster to court over post-Brexit bill
- 7 Alan Duncan should have spoken out sooner about Boris Johnson
- 8 What's the appeal behind Line of Duty?
- 9 The only Brexit export boom is from UK businesses rushing to Europe
- 10 PRINCE PHILIP: Why this Danish, Greek, German immigrant epitomised Britain
Rees-Mogg replied: "There has been an extraordinary success in procurement that had to be done very quickly and everyone wanted it done very quickly."
Highlighting that 80% of contracts worth more than £120,000 had already been published in the public domain, the Tory MP added: "Everyone knows that if you have a leak at 2am and call a plumber out, it costs more than if you book him to come in three months' time. We were in the situation of having a leak at 2am. It was inevitably expensive."
Twitter users were quick to ridicule the MP.
Robert Saunders quipped: "Fair point. I often pay millions of pounds to plumbers with no prior experience of plumbing, especially if they are related to me or have worked on my political campaigns. And I still pay them when they supply pipes that don't fit."
Slough For Europe's Twitter account posted: "Hands up anyone who's decided in the middle of the night that instead of calling a plumber to fix a leak you'll call a newly formed company with zero experience of plumbing based in a distant tax haven and pay them way over the normal cost..."
Institute for Government programme director Nick Davies added: "In this analogy, Jacob Rees-Mogg set up a special phone line for his friends to pitch plumbing ideas, agreed with the first quotes offered, continued paying emergency rates months after experienced plumbers became available again, and then scolded his wife for questioning him."
Thom Brooks, a professor of law at Durham University, pointed out a problem with Rees-Mogg's analogy: "You'd phone a plumber, not a mate who is untrained but happy to try a hand at fixing your leak at high rates and no competition."
Arthur Snell quipped: "Surely the learning point here is to set up a plumbing business in JRM's neighbourhood."
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.