Letter: Why ‘No Deal’ is the best way to stop Brexit
Jacob Rees-Mogg pictured at a fringe meeting at Manchester Town Hall, called 'Brexit with Jacob Rees-Mogg', held by the Bruges Group as part of the Conservative Party Conference in Manchester. Picture date: 2 October, 2017. Photo credit should read: Matt Crossick/ EMPICS Entertainment. - Credit: Empics Entertainment
Theresa May's spineless capitulation to the European Research Group moves us closer to the no-deal exit of Jacob Rees-Mogg's sepia-tinted dreams.
This is not necessarily a bad thing.
The toxic shock of austerity led us into Brexit and arguably only the toxic shock of becoming a third-rate dumping-ground country will lead us out of it. Brexit is a delusion of which large parts of the country, of the media and of the Tory party need to be cured.
This will only happen when it becomes clear that the Brexit project has failed. A soft Brexit along the lines initially proposed by Mrs May would only have led to 20 years of moaning from Farage and Rees-Mogg that we'd 'done it wrong'.
Fail it will. This is a great country with innovative businesses but it is not big enough to stand alone without being exploited by trade partners old and new.
You may also want to watch:
Lewis Fletcher
Nottingham
Most Read
- 1 Who's on the BBC's Question Time tonight?
- 2 Tory MP says policies no longer match 'principles on which millions have backed us'
- 3 Tory MP blames 'chaotic parents' for children going to school hungry
- 4 Liz Truss to deliver speech rejecting 'Britain First' strategy ahead of US election
- 5 More approve of EU leadership than Boris Johnson's premiership, poll finds
- 6 Brexit shambles: A stress of our own making
- 7 Minister self-isolates just a day after being spotted flouting mask rules
- 8 Boris Johnson 'hid in bedroom' to avoid grilling on Brexit stance days before becoming PM
- 9 Tory minister's claim over free school meals funding gets quickly debunked
- 10 UKIP set to select 'Dr Gammons' as candidate for London mayoral election
I was very interested in Roger Hinds' letter (TNE #103) about the open and transparent way the Danish parliament scrutinises and manages its government's negotiating position at EU summits. Hence, Danish MPs and citizens are so much more informed than ours.
The Danish system is so good it was the model enthusiastically argued for in a paper from the Politeia think tank published in 2007 with the title: Restoring Parliamentary Authority. The paper calls our own system of scrutiny 'feeble'.
The co-authors were Nick Timothy and someone called Theresa May. I assume this is not the present occupant of No 10 who has fought tooth and nail against a role for parliament at every stage, in some cases right up to the Supreme Court. No one could possibly be such a hypocrite – or could they?
Graham Rawlings
Selby
• To submit a letter for The New European's letter pages email letters@theneweuropean.co.uk
Become a Supporter
The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.
