An open letter to Labour MPs who oppose a second referendum

PUBLISHED: 15:36 07 June 2019 | UPDATED: 16:28 07 June 2019

Lisa Nandy, Caroline Flint, Angela Rayner and Gloria de Piero all oppose a People's Vote. Photograph: PA.

Lisa Nandy, Caroline Flint, Angela Rayner and Gloria de Piero all oppose a People's Vote. Photograph: PA.

Archant

An open letter to Lisa Nandy, Caroline Flint, Gloria de Piero, Angela Rayner and other Labour MPs who oppose the huge majority of the party on the issue of a second referendum.

Become a Supporter

The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism

Judging from your discussions with your constituents, have you concluded that the grievances they claim to have been expressing through their Leave vote were all, or predominantly, attributable to membership of the EU?

Have they persuaded you that the information on which they based their judgment was accurate and sufficient? In particular, have you found them fully informed about the benefits of EU membership?

Based on your own access from parliamentary sources to better quality information, and your professional responsibility to master and apply this information, do you sincerely believe that leaving the EU will materially improve your constituents' lives, in terms of prosperity, security and quality of life, within, say, the span of their working lives?

You may also want to watch:

Are you satisfied that the narrow referendum result of 2016, achieved against the background of apparent procedural and financial malfeasance on the part of the Leave campaigns, which remains the subject of ongoing forensic investigations, represented the genuine and un-manipulated view of the electorate, and, further, that this view remains that of the 2019 electorate, which has in the intervening period undergone a turnover three times that needed to reverse the result?

Do you believe that the interests of your party and your own career should transcend those of the nation and your constituents?

If your answer to all, or any, of these is 'no', why have you elected to play catspaw to Nigel Farage, rather than engaging your constituents in a process of education and informed debate?

Charles Baily, Bedford

- Join the conversation by writing to The New European - send your letters for publication to letters@theneweuropean.co.uk - and pick up your copy every Thursday.

Become a Supporter

The New European is proud of its journalism and we hope you are proud of it too. We believe our voice is important - both in representing the pro-EU perspective and also to help rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.

You've seen the news, now discover the story

The New European is committed to providing in-depth analysis of the Brexit process, its implications and progress as well as celebrating European life.

Try 13 weeks for £13

Latest Articles

Most Read

latest issue

ANTI-BREXIT EVENTS

Here's our pick of the upcoming Remain-focused campaign activities, talks and events nationwide.

Newsletter Sign Up

The New European weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy